I wonder if there are people who know a provable sign of a creator of nature.
I saw this video created by someone who proved this with only a banana. It's a bit embarrassing and hard to believe, but the banana fits exactly into a human hand. This could not have been formed through evolution.
I would like to learn more of these signs. Does anyone know ?
*apologize for my bad english.
2007-07-12 08:38:42 · 27 answers · asked by Simon 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
WTH. I was only looking for more information of these signs.
All these dam atheists are so easily worked up.
relax.
2007-07-13 02:02:26 · update #1
Try the website below, I think you'll find it will answer many of your questions on crationism.
2007-07-12 08:42:06 · answer #1 · answered by Joshua B 4 · 3⤊ 5⤋
The Divina Porportione.
The Golden Section.
http://milan.milanovic.org/math/english/golden/golden5.html
Amazing!
2007-07-12 20:49:17 · answer #2 · answered by Goddess of Laundry 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The banana has been cultivated by man for the last 4000 years.
Wild bananas are nothing like the one in stores. They do not have a nice colour change to show they are ripe, they have big seeds and you need a knife or sharp teeth to peel them.
That video was produced by either:
1. A total idiot.
2. Someone willing to tell huge lies to try to convert people. (Or sell videos)
What about a pineapple? What went wrong with that?
2007-07-12 15:58:17 · answer #3 · answered by Simon T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The banana could indeed fit into a lot of things, the human hand being only one of many! This hardly disproves Darwin' s hypothesis! I find that a pint beer glass fits perfectly between the bar surface and my mouth. Intelligent design! Oh yeah!
2007-07-12 15:50:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
One food out of millions fits the human hand. Were we designed to eat only bananas? Where do artichokes come in?
I believe in God but I know that a banana is in no way proof of a creator.
2007-07-12 15:42:54 · answer #5 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The wild banana looks nothing like the cultured ones that have been changing over the last two hundred years that they have been systematically raised as a crop.
The Banana argument is actually used as a joke by we atheists, it is so poorly constructed.
2007-07-12 15:47:25 · answer #6 · answered by Herodotus 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
You are correct, je hebt gelijk,
the banana shows evidence of design, it was cultivated by MAN over many years. Wild bananas are nearly inedible and look nothing like what we know as "banana".
Incidentally, the banana also fits in various orifices/holes in the human body, does it mean it was designed to go there?
And where does this leave the pineapple?
2007-07-12 15:47:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
So it fits exactly into a human hand. Sounds like a coincidence. If this was a sign of the creator, why don't pineapples?
2007-07-12 15:51:57 · answer #8 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That was a domesticated banana; genetically manipulated by humans to evolve into its current form. A wild and natural (God-made) banana is unfit to eat.
Besides, if God made the banana to help mankind eat, why did he make the coconut so damn impossible?
2007-07-12 15:46:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You are impressed because a banana fits into a human hand ? Wow.
I remember, as a young adult being amazed that my finger fits so well into my nose. I guess that's another sign ...
2007-07-12 15:47:34 · answer #10 · answered by Alan 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
what's more wierd to me than "the banana fits exactly into a human hand" is how God created different flavors and colorful fruites and vegetables with different forms and shape from just the sand of the earth.
2007-07-12 15:49:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋