1) I'm an evolutionist an a graduated biologist. So these are my conclusions about evolution here on R&S:
You must not question evolution EVER. If you question it in any way you WILL be deemed an ignorant (only ignorant people question things). Don't even mention evolution here in Y!A. Evolution is the law, evolution is everything, evolution is my life, evolution is ALL that matters, evolution turns me on. You don't have the authorithy to say anything about evolution. If you are not accepting evolution as the one and only truth, it must be because you never even been to a science class in high school. Nobody is dumb enought not to know everything there is to know about evolution.
"Ahhhhh, sarcasm!!!!!!!"
Dracula
That felt good.
Again, you can offend me all you want, i'm an evolutionist.
2)Now the question
What music are you listening to now?
I'm listening to Creep (i think it is at least, it most certainly is Stone Temple Pilots). A while ago the radio playied Callifornia Uber Alles, one of my favorites.
Paz de Cristo
2007-07-12 08:18:44 · 32 answers · asked by Emiliano M. 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Now its playing Alice in Chains =D
2007-07-12 08:20:55 · update #1
Lol. A lot of you guys did'nt get the sarcasm part did you... oh well...
2007-07-12 08:24:46 · update #2
zytlaly- could you please transate that? (I don't understand spanish, i'm brazillian, speak only portugese)
2007-07-12 08:27:53 · update #3
Well I am a Christian and I believe in evolution. But to answer your question... I am currently listening to journey's greatest hits.
2007-07-12 08:22:34 · answer #1 · answered by Deuce 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
a million) in accordance to evolutionists, human beings more desirable from apes? human beings are apes by making use of definition. Linnaeus categorized us as such and he became a creationist. 2) there are various shown info in technology, yet evolution is completely a theory. fake through a faux effect of the be conscious theory. A actuality, in technology, is a discrete factor of advice. Theories connect info and clarify them. there is no larger classification than theory. 3) A transitional form is a fossil of an animal that's a factor one species and area yet another. fake. All organisms are transitional. 4) The age of the earth is set by making use of scientists completely in the direction of the radioactive relationship of fossils ? The age of the Earth became desperate by making use of relationship a meteor on the thought the photograph voltaic device became each and every of an identical age. All different calculations greater healthful the age discovered. 5) The scientific approach starts with a prediction and then seems for info to help that prediction? It starts with remark. Then a speculation is formed from that remark. After the speculation is formed, scientists seek for info to help or falsify the speculation. 6) the assumption of evolution consists of the great Bang? fake. 7) To have confidence in evolution is to have confidence that life and count got here from not something? fake.
2016-12-14 06:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by nations 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even Darwin said that Evolution would be proven true in the future by the billions of yet undiscovered intermediate species (missing links) that would have to exist for evolution to work.
Update 2007: Theres a guy in China with a dremmel tool etching feathers on a lizard fossil and claiming to find the missing link from dinos to birds.
Evolution "Scientists" have committed so many frauds trying to prove evolution. (Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man ect.)They have no credibility with me and I am not all that religious.
For evolution to be true the missing links would have to be the overwhelming majority of the fossil record but instead they are either extremely rare or non existent.
2007-07-12 13:27:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The heart of research is to question the subject you are studying. If we do not question modern evolutionary theory the science will not grow. However to question is not the same as embracing a fairy tale involving 7 days and a talking snake over something for which there is a preponderance of evidence to support.
Myles Davis Quiet Nights.
2007-07-12 08:28:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good news everyone!
Huzzah for Science!
And I'm listening to some classical music from the 20th century. I think the artist was named Sir Mix-a-Lot and the song is "Baby Got Back". Gotta love the classics
2007-07-12 08:22:04 · answer #5 · answered by Professor Farnsworth 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Lilly, Rosemary, and the Jack of Hearts by Bob Dylan, followed by Little by Little, by Junior Wells.
2007-07-12 08:25:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a chemist... amen to that. I studied Darwin and evolution (as well as the pathetic arguments from creationists) in a college class. I really wonder how many who speak out so vehemently against evolution, have ever taken a class on it.
Listening to Paul Simon's 'Cool Cool River'
2007-07-12 08:33:52 · answer #7 · answered by Lisa 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Listening to Sirius
2007-07-12 08:35:28 · answer #8 · answered by Frank R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really like the part about only idiots question - I knew you were being a smartas* then because questioning is the very basis for intelligent rebellion... and stuff.
A wee bit o teh A.F.I.
2007-07-12 08:23:25 · answer #9 · answered by Edhelosa 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Creep isn't by STP. Someone else.
I'm listening to my own personal Yahoo radio station...
2007-07-12 08:24:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋