Since science hasn't yet figured out the theory of happiness, happiness must not exist. And I'm happy with this.
-Atheism, the logical choice.
2007-07-12 07:18:40 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Since when is happiness a theory?
Happiness is a fact; theories are for explaining WHY people are happy.
Sort of like evolution is a fact; and we develop theories to explain why evolution happens.
2007-07-12 07:21:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
good judgment? If something is created, good judgment says there's a writer. The regulation of Causalities says that each and each result has a reason. it is the muse of technology. and it is Logical. the super Bang has very just about anybody with a Logical concepts on board. That reported in case you bypass all the some time past to the 2nd previously the super bang. the final reason at the back of each and everything that follows is Logically, What? I logicaly end that "something which could exist exterior of Time" led to it. What "that" is desires extra logical debate than we've area for. You look into it and are available to a call. although, Atheism is a call that takes "faith" no longer good judgment. You wish that there is not any God. a minimum of no longer a Christian God. because of the fact IF there is. And IF we've a soul. Then we've a result. a minimum of that's what good judgment tells me.
2016-10-01 11:20:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sit down, Mr. Stand Up, because this anology is totally off the wall. Happiness is not a theory. It's a mood trait, and further, what does it have to do with religious belief?
2007-07-12 07:24:58 · answer #3 · answered by deanie1962 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This neither makes sense nor is it even a supposition of any logical atheist I have ever encountered.
You have set up a "straw-man" argument against atheism, by suggesting that atheism would posit anything similar to this.
Do you really want to impugn your own reputation by conducting such a deceitful lambasting?
- {♂♂} - {♂♀} - {♀♀} -
2007-07-12 08:26:24 · answer #4 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
two points...woohoo!!! this is cute. although i am pretty sure that athiests think people of faith believe they have all the answers, which is a very irritating trait that athiests love to harp on, yet they have all the answers through science. a little hypocritical considering science was invented by man so therefore is exponentially fallible. funny how we think the exact same thing about each other...
everyone have a great day!!
2007-07-12 07:30:53 · answer #5 · answered by Sue 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're saying that nothing exists that science hasn't figured out? You're obviously not acquainted with logical thought.
2007-07-12 07:31:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cool paradox. Glad you're happy with something that doesn't exist. Now, to convince the others to be happy without mythology.
2007-07-12 07:22:14 · answer #7 · answered by Elaine P...is for Poetry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, that's just plain silly. It's much more logical to believe that a cosmic Jewish zombie, who is his own father, can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him that you accept him as your master so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced to eat from a magical tree by an infinitely sadistic being, disguised as a talking snake with legs...
2007-07-12 07:22:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, that makes sense, but as hard as it seems, even without religion we cannot know everything. Even though I am an atheist, I try to make the world a better place for my time here, since I am gone when I die, no afterlife. Think about that.
2007-07-12 07:21:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't tell if you're being serious or ironic, but yes, atheism is the logical choice.
2007-07-12 07:21:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋