English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There is no Creator, we don't live in a "creation". The universe always existed, not to say that it is immortal or anything, it is just here. Something, other than god, exists within the physical universe that brought about everything. We just don't know yet what that "thing" is. Now let us never speak of this again.

-Atheism, the logical choice.

Does this sound logical??? *hint *hint to those who think I'm an atheist.

2007-07-12 07:09:49 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

no i dont agree

2007-07-12 07:13:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Logic? If something is created, Logic says there is a Creator. The Law of Causalities says that every effect has a cause. that is the basis of science. and it is Logical. The Big Bang has just about everyone with a Logical mind on board. That said if you go all the way back to the moment before the big bang. The ultimate Cause of everything that follows is Logically, What? I logicaly conclude that "Something that can exist outside of Time" caused it. What "that" is needs more logical debate than we have space for. You look into it and decide. However, Atheism is a choice that takes "faith" not logic. You Hope that there is no God. at least not a Christian God. Because IF there is. And IF we have a soul. Then we have a consequence. At least that's what Logic tells me.

2016-05-20 22:26:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

You're not doing a good job of even describing the scientific approach to cosmology. There is no evidence of something starting the universe.

Recent theory (within the past month) that tries to take into account the energy differentials at the "big bang" that were not meeting observed evidence has suggested that instead of a "big bang" there was a "big bounce." In other words, the universe did not start from a singularity, but instead was collapsing upon itself, then blew back up again. This is naturally open to further scrutiny (it doesn't' take into account the acceloration of the the universe's expansion that is being observed).

It seems that there is no greater leap of logic to say the the Universe (matter/energy) have always existed than to say that God has always existed.

^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^

2007-07-12 07:23:38 · answer #3 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 1 1

No! I am afraid it is the result of shallow thinking. Atheism is not at all logical.
Get this for a quote* (it is a question that will never be answered by those who look for a naturalistic explanation for the universe and life):- * "How did stupid atoms write their own software . . .? Nobody knows . . .". P.Davies, Life force, New Scientist 163(2204): 27-30, 18/9/1999. Paul Davies is a physicist and atheist.
When any of the atheists on this forum answers this question, then I will start to take what they say seriously, until then I will regard their musings as the pseudo-scientific bluff and nonsense which anyone with common sense has already sussed out.
In other words, atheists never answer any of the fundamental questions which arise from their believing in naturalistic origins, they always make excuses. So it is obvious that their beliefs have no solid foundation, they are simply based on wishful thinking and a vague hope that sometime, in the far distant future, science will come up with an answer to such impossible questions. You call that logical? How about Alice in Wonderland?

2007-07-12 07:19:05 · answer #4 · answered by A.M.D.G 6 · 1 2

You sound like a believer, trying to imagine how an atheist must think. The steady-state universe was abandoned long ago, after it was confirmed the universe is expanding. Your assertion that "something other that God exists within the physical universe" and that it "brought about everything" is completely unsupported by any evidence and is therefore exactly as false as any believer's assertion that God exists. What you state does not sound logical.

2007-07-12 07:33:18 · answer #5 · answered by Diogenes 7 · 0 1

An absolute infinite (always existing universe) is an impossibility and illogical.

You have two options in origins of the universe it is either an impersonal force or an able intelligence. The more logical inference would be an able intelligence do to the nature and complexity of all the systems and cycles of the universe. Chance would be the least likely to infer.

2007-07-12 07:21:37 · answer #6 · answered by Who's got my back? 5 · 2 0

Sounds more logical than beleiveing some all powerful deity created us and takes stock in every minute detail of our lives, while allowing evil to exist.

But youre just so smart, why dont you tell us why it is so illogical to you...

Sounds to me as if you have little understanding and are attempting to bag on science, abiogenesis and evolution - all of which, I remind you, has absolutely NOTHING TO DO with atheism, which is nothing more than a simply disbelief in deities. What part of THAT do you not understand?

2007-07-12 07:15:15 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 1 1

You have changed very little you still have an unknownn. The unknown is not a scientific existence--because there is no data to prove such. That unknow is God--there is no scientific explanation or evidence to contradict such. a statement with such logic as God

2007-07-12 08:01:05 · answer #8 · answered by j.wisdom 6 · 1 0

The current theory is that parallel universes older than our own collided and started the big-bang (from which all things cometh) LOL Capiche???
At least we admitt our explanations are theories and not tout some ancient book as the absolute truth when it has been proven to contain nonsense in many areas.

2007-07-12 07:15:38 · answer #9 · answered by RealRachel 4 · 4 1

Ofcourse its hard to explain cuz no one has the answer to this. I wouldn't call myself an atheist, but then again I'm not a strong believer either.

2007-07-12 07:13:06 · answer #10 · answered by Mrs. DiCaprio 4 · 0 0

Since it conforms to the evidence, it is indeed the logical choice. Any sort of belief in a deity does NOT conform to the evidence; see:

2007-07-12 07:15:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers