English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are the man´s acts responsible for the global warming?

2007-07-12 06:16:22 · 21 answers · asked by Lourenço 1 in Environment Global Warming

21 answers

No, of course we aren't responsible for global warming....the idea that mankind can influence the climate in any meaningful (and dangerous) way is absurd.

The global climate is so complex that it is sheer arrogance to assume that mankind (particularly just "us Americans") can cause the devastation that the Global-Warming-Chicken-Littles are claiming we are responsible for. We don't understand the weather enough to predict it more than a few days off, much less do we have the capacity to foresee long term changes.

Thirty years ago it was global cooling, now it's global warming...not far off, they'll probably change it to any "severe" global weather so they can go either way in laying climate blame on man. That way, whenever it gets too cold or whenever it gets too warm or whenever there is a hurricane or earthquake or -- whatever -- they can point a finger and say it's our fault.

* sigh *. Okay, I'm getting worked up here. Here endeth my rant.

2007-07-13 01:30:52 · answer #1 · answered by vitovixa 4 · 1 0

Nothing we do on Earth will help in any significant way. Mankind contributes a meager 3% to "climate change"

Let's all be thankful the Earth did warm a little. The alternative is far worse… Global Cooling… Mini Ice Age…

Global Warming Alarmists are merely opportunists jumping on the cash cow trying to earn a quick buck by scaring people into believing they are destroying the planet.
The same fanatics were screaming about "Global Cooling" in the 70's!! See this ===> http://www.glennbeck.com/2006news/newsweek-coolingworld.pdf

We have reached the apex of Earth's recent warming trend and we will gradually start cooling down again within the next 10 years.

I will be sitting here with my smug smile 10 years from know when all the "Global Warming" followers realize how foolish they have been.

2007-07-12 18:14:24 · answer #2 · answered by Eric R 6 · 3 1

No way.

Here...check out this website that's run by some really good scientists from Harvard-Smithsonian and professors from other prestigious institutes all over North America, www.friendsofscience.org. They really put up convincing and (reluctantly) UN Climate Report backed data that shows that Global Warming is natural and normal. They totally convince me that the cause of this natural temperature flucuation is the most simple source, the sun. For instance, for centuries, the sun has always intensified and weakened its radiation upon the earth, thus causing temperatures to change from century to century. During the 1400's, the Medieval Warming period took place, when temperatures were 3-4 degrees warmer than they are today! And after that during the 1700-1800's, we went through a little known Little Ice Age, when the temperatures dropped 1-2 degrees. Right now, we're only coming out of an ice age, so no wonder our temperatures are higher than they were 100-200 years ago. Which explains why they're still completely normal. And besides, in the sixties, when industry was reaching a peak, and carbon emissions were at an all time high, the temperature actually dropped! Scientists actually thought that we were going to go through another ice age. Yet, during the same time, the sun's rays weakened, thus proving that it was in direct correlation to the temperatures here on earth. So, to conclude, global warming isn't man-made, it's completely natural, caused by the sun.

Besides, anyone who really believes in global warming should just turn the a/c on instead of complaining about it...lol.

2007-07-12 15:21:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

I don't think we know what we're talking about in less someone is an enviormental scientist that just graduated from Oxford or something but what i do know is even if global warming doesnt exist the exhaustion put out by cars and industialization isn't good. When i say 'isn't good' i mean unclean. and even if that won't destroy the earth it's self-it still isn't clean and should be stopped even if it means being a world-wide movement.

2007-07-13 16:03:43 · answer #4 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

No, man is guilty of doing significant harm to his ecosystem, but he is not the culprit in "Global Warming".

Less than 1 degree increase in a century, but no one has been able to calculate the total Greenhouse effect in ANY year within 5 degrees, much less one.

Alarmists won't tell you that their hypotheses are meaningless without computer models, and they won't allow anyone independent analysis of the computer program or underlying algorithms - the one time that they did, they were uncovered as DELIBERATELY FRAUDULENT. They have never apologized for this.

No one here has access to these programs, but they say there is no doubt or that debate is over. Without being able to analyze the PRIMARY PIECE OF EVIDENCE, how can anyone make that claim.

We won't even get into the false claims of consensus, the dismissal and silencing of opposing viewpoints, or the incomplete collection of empirical evidence.

2007-07-13 01:58:01 · answer #5 · answered by 3DM 5 · 1 1

Global warming (and cooling) is entirely natural. Scientists discovered conifers and insects beneath the thick ice in Greenland, showing that even a country as cold as Greenland was once around 24 degrees celsius in the day.

We've been heating up for 10,000 years (the last ice age, global cooling), and over the last couple of hundred years, scientists have found that plants have smaller pores on their leaves, because they don't have to work so hard to take in Carbon Dioxide; there's more CO2 than they need. The results showed this -before- private jets and "a car for every home".

Don't believe the hype.

2007-07-12 13:24:31 · answer #6 · answered by J2809 2 · 9 2

ABSOLUTELY YES.

Look at the temperature at 4 AM. Then man shows up on the highways at 8 AM and the temperature starts rising. While man is at work during the day, the temperature climbs even higher. Then finally man heads home around 5 PM and gradually the air temperature comes back down. When man finally goes to sleep, the temperature resumes cooler still.

It happens EVERYWHERE too! You can even go out with a thermometer and MEASURE IT!

So there's no doubt. The consensus is in, and there is no longer any time for debate. If we don't do something now, the earth will erupt in a ball of fire within... well, maybe as soon as 5 years even! But, if we all use flourescent light bulbs, the earth will be saved and the temperature won't do that anymore.

2007-07-12 13:23:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8 4

Global warming is one-half of the climatic cycle of warming and cooling.
The earth's mean temperature cycles around the freezing point of water.
This is a completely natural phenomenon which has been going on since there has been water on this planet. It is driven by the sun.
Our planet is currently emerging from a 'mini ice age', so is becoming warmer and may return to the point at which Greenland is again usable as farmland (as it has been in recorded history).
As the polar ice caps decrease, the amount of fresh water mixing with oceanic water will slow and perhaps stop the thermohaline cycle (the oceanic heat 'conveyor' which, among other things, keeps the U.S. east coast warm).
When this cycle slows/stops, the planet will cool again and begin to enter another ice age.
It's been happening for millions of years.
Humans did not cause it.
Humans cannot stop it.

2007-07-12 13:20:57 · answer #8 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 7 3

Simply, no.

Most (99.5%) of the global warming would be happening even if mankind never existed.

Most of the g.w stuff is bogus anyway..

The 'real' science of which uses 'valid' data for its climate models, proved it several times over.

2007-07-14 16:48:23 · answer #9 · answered by pcreamer2000 5 · 0 0

Yes, emissions of GHG's are effecting the climate. To those claiming it is a natural cycle (solely): Historically CO2 has lagged 200 - 1000 years behind the rise in temperature. It has, in the past, acted as a very strong amplifying effect to global warming. The initial cause has been various natural cycles. Now we see a direct correlation between the rise in CO2 and in temperature. As humans release CO2 in to the atmosphere it traps more heat on Earth. This leads to more CO2 being released (as in the past), thus CO2 is presently both a cause and a strong amplifier.
Greenland was, during the MWP, close to or just as warm as today. This was, however, a regional warming, not a global one.

2007-07-12 14:09:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anders 4 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers