Which do you prefer and what is their differences in performance for their carbon bikes?
2007-07-12 05:30:36 · 6 answers · asked by Mobidus Lee 3 in Sports ➔ Cycling
Take both out for a test ride and by the one you like. In the end, that's all that matters.
2007-07-12 05:38:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look, these are both great bikes. Both are American built and are even being ridden in the Tour as we speak. That being said, fit is crucial. Personally, Cannondales fit me great. Treks have always been a little long for me. Second, ride them both. They both feel a little different. In terms of warranty, they both have lifetime on the frames.
2007-07-12 15:42:24 · answer #2 · answered by Jay P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the trek carbon bikes are a little more aerodynamic than some of the cannondales, depending on the models, the madone SSL 6.9 is very race oriented compared to the '08 SystemSix Si Replica.
2007-07-12 13:53:35 · answer #3 · answered by Nick W 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not much difference. I'd go with the one that has a better warranty and customer service support. So far, I've heard of people's good experiences with Trek.
2007-07-12 14:16:23 · answer #4 · answered by eyk2007 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my father-in-law and his wife both rode cannondale....
but now he has a full carbon cervlo
so i guess cannondale
2007-07-12 12:37:32 · answer #5 · answered by muchi_mac003 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
trek, the shape of their frames can cause a big difference, such as weight, occupation of space, and so on.....
2007-07-15 10:50:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋