I just cant come up with any consequences of not knowing how to fish other than not being able to have lots of fun fishing...
2007-07-11 19:23:31 · 15 answers · asked by serpintina 1 in Sports ➔ Outdoor Recreation ➔ Fishing
Then you can't teach your kids. Then they can't teach your grandkids, and you can't teach your grandkids.
Fishing is a family thing.
Make it happen.
2007-07-11 19:28:17 · answer #1 · answered by puckdance35 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Any guy who does not know how to fish seems somewhat femine and should wear a skirt. Nothing is worse then bringing a male on the boat who is scared to bait there hook or take a fish off. The possible consequences are being made fun of, beat up, thrown in water, or smacked with a fish.
2007-07-13 05:46:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There have been times in our history when it's been tough to make a living. Especially during the Great Depression, or during wars. Fishing is a means of self-sufficiency, and it provides food for the table if the need arises. Sure, it's alot of fun, but it could also save your life.
2007-07-11 19:33:55 · answer #3 · answered by C J 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One consequence of not learning how to fish is, you cant get away from your wife and kids for at least a couple of hours on a Saturday morning. Everyone knows a guy needs at least a few hours of piece and quiet....
2007-07-12 05:49:42 · answer #4 · answered by Ace 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well you know what they say.... give a man a fish and he will eat for a day... teach a man to fish and he'll be dead of Mercury poisoning inside of 4 months..... seriously though learning to fish doesnt take long ... if your just interested in the basics.... its a relaxing way to spend some time outside... and just get back to the basics of life...
2007-07-11 21:38:18 · answer #5 · answered by Stanford F 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not take up catch and release deer hunting as well? For even more kicks you can set up a giant hook and drag bambi around the forest for a while...
...fishing for food is OK. Commercial fishing has largely overstepped its once legitimate bounds. Fishing for 'sport' is nothing less than wantonly cruel. Think about it. If those fish had fur instead of scales would you still enjoy the 'sport' of animal mutilation?
Its kind of a moot point though, the way things are going there's not likely to be any fish left for the next generation anyway.
2007-07-11 20:32:21 · answer #6 · answered by megalomaniac 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
If anything should happen to society and the world as we know it is no longer. Knowing how to fish could save your life. If you don't know how to fish you would not be able to feed yourself and your family.
2007-07-11 19:27:54 · answer #7 · answered by D and G Gifts Etc 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Newton's 0.33 regulation of action does not word to whether an action is "stable" or "undesirable". It concerns physics, not morality. do not confuse them. additionally, the definition of sorcery is particularly vast. It does not state something particular in terms of what happens whilst a undeniable action is gone by using. maximum individuals agree that the age old debate is in basic terms: became Jesus an difficulty-free guy, a loopy individual, a sorcerer, or became he who he suggested he became: God? And if he became God, why ought to he make your "regulations of sorcery" nevertheless word to him, an infinitely in a position being?
2016-10-20 23:07:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if you were stranded on a desert island or the wilderness with no food, I'm sure it could come in handy.
2007-07-11 19:26:43 · answer #9 · answered by answerator 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lack of fishing skill
2007-07-11 19:31:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
theres also losing out on the opportunity for free fish (if you catch anything edible)
2007-07-11 19:28:03 · answer #11 · answered by David S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋