Impressionist and post impressionists have more philosophically approach to wards their work than their previous counter parts.
2007-07-11 18:31:46 · 7 answers · asked by The More I learn The More I'm Uneducated 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Painting
Religion is Philosophy I accept
But i see very little Philosophical approach.
Very few artist have dared to do so, that is what I mean to say.
2007-07-11 18:53:51 · update #1
Muthu I'm talking about art and that too paintings, it is about isms, periods and expressions
2007-07-12 16:29:53 · update #2
I agree, I think it takes a lost more to really put your own thought into something such as impressionism. Not to discredit others, but they were artist of reality, not that that is bad or anything.
2007-07-11 18:39:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds wrong.
Consider how much of the vast body of pre-impressionist work is religious in nature. Since religion is just philosophy in a dress, how can you claim they have a less philosophical approach? Or putting aside all religious art, how could someone come up with an idea like the Golden Mean, without applying philosophy? You must be ignoring political art of any kind, for there is plenty of pre-impressionist political art.
2007-07-12 01:50:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is called 'zeitgeist'.
You can see it in many things. fi: In the tv-series Star Trek, Next Generation there is a counselor on board, Deanna Troy. Sounds unrelated? It isn't. Suddenly it was in the spirit of the time to have a counselor. The question has been raised how future generations would view this 'need' to have one. And why wasn't there one on the original series? The time wasn't 'right' yet.
Same goes for the opinions formed about art. They are made from the perspective of that time. If philosophy and psychology are 'an item' they will find their way into art and the way 'we' view it. QED
2007-07-12 04:48:01 · answer #3 · answered by Puppy Zwolle 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am sure that no human can create.
Sometimes I feel that those colours are not mine.
The model, and those lines, strokes, and that light produced are not at all mine.
My idea was totally different from this picture which is in front of me.
Tell me who is that real artist?
The great impressionist?
2007-07-12 08:25:18 · answer #4 · answered by Shripathi Krishna Acharya 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I am zero in arts :(
The only painting i saw was Monalisa in Louvre, Paris. but i did not like it.
I liked the other one.. a boat was sinking and people dying... it was just on the opposite wall of Monalisa...donno who painted it..
but when i come to India, i wil see (and surely appreciate) your paintings.
2007-07-12 11:56:47 · answer #5 · answered by ۞Aum۞ 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
R U talking about yr avatar
2007-07-12 12:16:44 · answer #6 · answered by Muthu S 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have no idea about this.
2007-07-12 11:23:36 · answer #7 · answered by Devarat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋