English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For us that voted for Pres. Bush and all the innocents soldiers, and all the innocent ones that went to war in the Middle east; that got killed and their blood flowing on the ground. Does that mean we too are guilty of blood stains on our hands? Now a higher %tage of people are saying that Bush had his own personal motives to go to war. For his self gratification like as of revenge for them trying to kill his dad; or because of the oil. Please be serious about this crime under God because now I am worried.

2007-07-11 14:06:56 · 20 answers · asked by Debs 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

That would depend on whether or not you discerned his future intentions when you voted for him.
If you genuinely thought him to be the best candidate, the one capable of having a possitive influence, the one who would do things to benefit the greater good not himself, then I would say you were naive and should think more carefully in future, but you aren't blood guilty.
Anyone who voted for him, knowing he was likely to carry out the attrocites he has committed...they ARE blood guilty.

2007-07-11 14:21:14 · answer #1 · answered by . 6 · 0 2

No. You do not have blood on your hands, and please don't believe everything you hear or read.

Don't even take what I say as the truth without testing it.

I don't have a Bible in front of me, but in the New Testament, in the book of Romans, there is an outline of when a country is justified in going to war. Throughout the OT, there is justification for war and capital punishment.

Your President has one primary responsibility under our constitution...To ensure the security of the homeland. It is plain and simple. He is doing his job and there will be opposition. I am just thankful for a President that takes his responsibilities more seriously than his popularity.

People who say that he is in this for his personal ambitions are not serious thinkers and are even small minded. Think about it, what does he really stand to gain that he couldn't have otherwise?

Freedom has always required the shedding of blood. Those that oppose this reality evidently forget that this great country exists because of those that have shed their blood.

Bush is accountable to God for his actions and motives, just as you are personally. He does not hold you responsible for anyone's actions but your own.

Sleep Well.

2007-07-11 14:22:09 · answer #2 · answered by Schneiderman 3 · 2 1

Do your parents have blood stains on their hands because President Truman had the Atom bombs dropped on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Thousands upon thousand of innocent children and old people were killed, burned alive, burned but lived with unrecognizable features, crippled for life and many just suffered until death many years later. In the future, before ridiculing one President for anything, do your homework. Bush had the support of both parties and the majority of the American people when we went to war in Iraq.

2007-07-11 14:16:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

The only thing you have to worry about is the liberal media giving you a 1-sided evil view and tearing a man down BECAUSE he has faith.

We had to go to war, democrats voted for it, the American people wanted it, and Saddam had to go, he was a tyrant. Read how many tyrants they killed in the OT. That is the way of things. Its unavoidable. but dont fall victim to liberal philosophy. These are the same people that say things like abortion and gay marriage is great.

2007-07-11 14:20:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

do not tell me that obamy hasn't blamed bush . he easily has. he blames bush to get the blame off himself. he's the worst president we could have so whilst he's cornered with the reality he blames bush or fox. at every time i anticipate he will start up blaming a canines. a year and a a million/2 is long adequate to video demonstrate his screw united statesand hear him whine "it became somebody elses fault". he has truly made a multitude

2016-10-20 22:12:47 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I've been saying this since Bush started talking about going to war. A Christian doesn't attack innocent people. Anyone could see through Bush's lies. It was completely obvious that he made up all the "facts" before the war. So many Christians were corrupted by church leaders to believe Bush talked to God. When actions don't fit the teachings of our Bible, it should be obvious that we're being duped. Do you have blood on your hands? I don't know. If you feel like you do, then repent and ask for forgiveness and then join the rest of us in this country demanding justice. Call your representatives, demand an end to this war, and then demand Bush and Cheney be impeached and tried for their crimes. Yeah I know its unlikely to happen, but this is our chance as Americans to make sure our politicians know we will go after them if they betray us. In the future, hopefully they'll think twice before betraying the country.

2007-07-11 14:14:55 · answer #6 · answered by Matt 3 · 0 5

Anyone that votes for a man or woman that does not follow God is as guilty as the person they vote for. it is called corporate sin.

2007-07-11 15:24:54 · answer #7 · answered by Ardys R 2 · 0 0

Bush is just the latest grinning, dopey front man. They found the biggest idiot they could and stole the election back in 2000, and then manipulated the 2004 election (It's no coincidence the CEO of Diebolt, a company producing computerized voting machines, "guaranteed" Bush would win Ohio. He did). 2008 probably will produce another grinning dope from the far right. It doesn't matter who's in the White House. The forces controlling our government are buried so deep we'll never really know who they are. Don't fret yourself over Bush's crimes; he wasn't alone in committing them, and I seriously doubt any of them were even his idea. He isn't that bright.

*Edit* Gee, I guess I'm getting all these "thumbs down" from that 24% that still support Bush.

2007-07-11 14:15:25 · answer #8 · answered by link955 7 · 0 5

All the blood that has been spilt during this stupid war will all go on the hands of those who started this war. That means George Bush and who ever the other leaders are from the other side.

2007-07-11 14:13:03 · answer #9 · answered by princezelph 4 · 0 4

President George W. Bush is Pro Life . .. Did you know there is a mass genocide going on in America today they are killing their babies . .. 50,000,000 babies have died in the last 20 years . .. who'd doing anything about that?

That doesn't even compare with number of soldiers that have died, volunteer solidiers who fought for the freedom of Americans who used that freedom to say it was okay to kill their own children.

Knowing that could you ever vote for a pro-choice candidate . .. Whatever else i feel about President G.W.Bush I'd vote for him, because he's a conservative pro-life candidate.

-LOVE your neighbor as yourself.
Amen.

2007-07-11 14:26:36 · answer #10 · answered by jesusfreakstreet 4 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers