Who or What Created Life?

Question

I don't want an answer like "things were always there." How are people so smart to think that nothing created life and that things were always there.

The Big Bang was a meteorite that came from somewhere and hit earth. Where did that came from and what caused it to hit the earth?

I say God created life. Evolutionists say "the universe was always there." That does not have any logic in the real world. Was the whole universe created by accident too. When some one ask "what created us?" Another answer "We evolved." That is not an answer.

atheists and scientists, accuse Christians of not having logic at all. But is it logic to say "things were always there." To build expand energy you need energy.

That Big Bang meteorite should have been pushed from somewhere. It does not make sense to say that every planet, every star, every moon, yes there is more than one moon, and every sun was created by accident. Worse yet to believe that the accident was caused by nothing.

The Big Bang in science. Was cause by a meteorite. What type? I don't know. But it was a meteorite. You read your books.

Answer 1

hmmm ... different lines of logic .. interesting ..

Answer 2

First you say:
"atheists and scientists, accuse Christians of not having logic at all."

and then you go on to say:
"The Big Bang was a meteorite that came from somewhere and hit earth."

I've seen many people get their facts on big bang theory wrong, but you sir, are by far the worst...

Here's a lil trivia for ya: Big bang theory is a theory that explains the orgins of our universe through observations and states that our universe began from a tremendously hot and dense point app 13.7 billion years.

Some more interesting facts?

-evolution explains how life on earth evolved reached the diversity we see today through change in the inherited traits of a population from generation to generation. It has absolutely nothing to do with the beginning of the universe (that's the job of the cosmologists and theoretical physicists) or how life itself began on earth (that's abiogenesis).

-scientists do not belive that "the universe was always there"... vast majority of scientists agree with the main ideas of the big bang theory (hopefully you know what that is now).

-"The Big Bang was a meteorite that came from somewhere and hit earth. Where did that came from and what caused it to hit the earth?" meteorites hit earth and other planets all the time. it's called gravity.

Your rather large number of mistakes and incorrect "facts" only shows me that your understanding of astronomy and biology is equivalent to that of a 3rd grader (literally). Please, go to the nearest library and rent out a copy of "Middle School Physical Science" and get yourself back into the 21st century, or simply hit yourself on the head with a large hammer repeatedly. Either way, you'll be better off intellectually than you are now...

Answer 3

"The Big Bang was a meteorite that came from somewhere and hit earth."
No, the big bang was the expansion of the universe out of a singularity.

The numerous planets and stars were not "created by accident", but are the consequence of the distribution of matter in the universe.

On at least one planet (Earth), there was enough liquid water for hundreds of millions of years that chemical reactions started producing complex molecules which had the power to synthesize similar molecules. This was the path to life.

Answer 4

The Big Bang was certainly not a meteorite that hit Earth. The Big Bang theory is a theory about the beginnings of the universe.

People who study evolution rarely study the very advanced physics required to analyze the beginnings of the universe.

I think that a couple of courses in science would clear up a lot of your questions. You don't seem to understand the Big Bang theory or the theory of evolution, so it is understandable that the answers pertaining to them might not make sense.

Answer 5

God created life. You need a smart being to create plants, animals, people and we need a higher being to watch after us because if there wasn't God we wouldn't have existed, we wouldn't able to sustain ourselves. If someone thinks that we evolved on our own, then where is the proof? I don't see half human half monkeys roaming around anyplace. By the way Tubester, before you say you're an atheist you have to understand the definition of an atheist. An atheist doesn't believe in anything at all. So I believe you contrradicted yourself when you say you believe in evolution.

Answer 6

You keep saying that god was always there. Isn't that just as illogical?

Anyway, why does life have to be created?

What you said about the big bang shows that someone has been telling you lies. I advise you to read some books -- proper books, not books recommended by creationists.

Ignorant boy,

Answer 7

I'm curious. You talk about evolutionists saying "the universe was always there" and that that doesn't have any logic in the real world. By your own admission then, saying that God has always been there has no logic in the real world either. I guess you just talked yourself out of believing in God.

Answer 8

Alright. So I'm an atheist. I don't believe in Creation, I believe in Evolution. What did we evolve from? Monkeys, primates. But, if you go far back enough, there has to be a beginning, something to evolve FROM. I don't know what that was. I don't know how life started. People have been trying to explain that forever. Some look to religion, some look to science. You found your answer, but I'm still looking.

Answer 9

First of all you have the Big Bang Theory wrong. And second most scientist will tell you they have no idea the original creation of life.
Science tells us how the Gods did it. It doesn't mean there was no divine creation.

Answer 10

"See this email I just sent you, that you're reading
right now? This email is proof of the existence of God.

Yeah, I know, that sounds crazy. But I'm not asking you
to believe anything just yet, until you see the evidence for
yourself. All I ask is that you refrain from disbelieving
while I show you my proof. It only takes a minute to convey,
but it speaks to one of the most important questions of all
time.

So how is this email proof of the existence of God?:

This email you're reading contains letters, words and
sentences. It contains a message that means something.
As long as you can read English, you can understand what
I'm saying.

You can do all kinds of things with this email. You
can read it on your computer screen. You can print it out on
your printer. You can read it out loud to a friend who's in
the same room as you are. You can call your friend and read it
to her over the telephone. You can save it as a Microsoft
WORD document. You can forward it to someone via email, or you
can post it on a website.

Regardless of how you copy it or where you send it,
the information remains the same. My email contains a message.
It contains information in the form of language. The message
is independent of the medium it is sent in.

Messages are not matter, even though they can be carried
by matter (like printing this email on a piece of paper).

Messages are not energy even though they can be carried
by energy (like the sound of my voice.)

Messages are immaterial. Information is itself a unique
kind of entity. It can be stored and transmitted and copied
in many forms, but the meaning still stays the same.

Messages can be in English, French or Chinese.
Or Morse Code. Or mating calls of birds. Or the Internet.
Or radio or television. Or computer programs or architect
blueprints or stone carvings. Every cell in your body
contains a message encoded in DNA, representing a complete
plan for you.

OK, so what does this have to do with God?

It's very simple. Messages, languages, and coded
information ONLY come from a mind. A mind that
agrees on an alphabet and a meaning of words and
sentences. A mind that expresses both desire and
intent.

Whether I use the simplest possible explanation,
such as the one I'm giving you here, or if we analyze
language with advanced mathematics and engineering
communication theory, we can say this with total
confidence:

"Messages, languages and coded information never,
ever come from anything else besides a mind.
No one has ever produced a single example of a message
that did not come from a mind."

Nature can create fascinating patterns - snowflakes,
sand dunes, crystals, stalagmites and stalactites. Tornados
and turbulence and cloud formations.

But non-living things cannot create language. They
*cannot* create codes. Rocks cannot think and they
cannot talk. And they cannot create information.

It is believed by some that life on planet earth arose
accidentally from the "primordial soup," the early ocean which
produced enzymes and eventually RNA, DNA, and primitive cells.

But there is still a problem with this theory: It fails to
answer the question, 'Where did the information come from?'

DNA is not merely a molecule. Nor is it simply a "pattern."
Yes, it contains chemicals and proteins, but those chemicals
are arranged to form an intricate language, in the exact same way
that English and Chinese and HTML are languages.

DNA has a four-letter alphabet, and structures very similar
to words, sentences and paragraphs. With very precise
instructions and systems that check for errors and correct them.

To the person who says that life arose naturally,
you need only ask: "Where did the information come from?
Show me just ONE example of a language that didn't come
from a mind."
Every word you hear, every sentence you speak, every
dog that barks, every song you sing, every email you read,
every packet of information that zings across the Internet,
is proof of the existence of God. Because information
and language always originate in a mind.

In the beginning were words and language.

In the Beginning was Information.

"In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God" --John 1:1

Answer 11

Since you don't understand the Big Bang -- it's not a meteorite -- it's hard to have a useful discussion here.