English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.wfp.org/country_brief/hunger_map/map/hungermap_popup/map_popup.html

Take a look at this map... it lists the countries of the world according to the percentage of their populations that suffer from hunger and undernourishment.

Now take a look at this one:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2e/Net_migration_rate_world.PNG

This one shows the "net migration rate" by country. Countries in blue are receiving immigrants, while countries in red are sending them.

If you look carefully, you'll see there is a clear correlation between the two maps.
Countries that appear in green in the first map (very low undernourishment) are receiving immigrants. Countries that appear in yellow, orange or red (moderate and high undernourishment) are sending them

The immigration issue is happening because of two reasons:

Firstly, as I have shown above, the crippling poverty and hunger in most of these countries.

Secondly, our unwillingness to punish corporations that hire illegals.

2007-07-11 08:49:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

To solve the issue, we need to start punishing corporations that BREAK THE LAW and hire these people illegally.... that will remove their incentive to emmigrate (jobs).

Then, we need to work out, internationally, a real solution to solve the crippling hunger and poverty in these nations.

As long as there are poor and hungry people in the third world, and able to find jobs here, they will keep immigrating.

2007-07-11 08:49:54 · update #1

A wall won't be enough to stop them if they are hungry, that's my point.

And may I remind you that sometimes we have only helped to make things worse in those countries, for example NAFTA has ruined millions of Mexican farmers.

2007-07-11 09:00:12 · update #2

8 answers

Thank you for making the same point I've been repeating endlessly. I agree.
Those individuals protesting the U.S.A. should be at home protesting their corrupt government, their criminal police and their opportunistic drug dealing military.
They should be demanding a FREE ENTERPRISE system that will permit them to have opportunity for a productive life AT HOME with their families, and enjoying their culture rather than demanding a recreation of their failed classist society here in the U.S.A.
In the U.S. we must PUNISH those financing the illegals.(those hiring them). The Eisenhower administration did, and it worked! (Until the Johnson administration changed the policy.)
We must SECURE OUR BORDERS. Not so much for the prevention of illegals as for "Homeland Security" reasons.

2007-07-11 09:03:55 · answer #1 · answered by Philip H 7 · 6 2

But there's also the 'invisible hand.' e.g the World financial institutions like the World Bank, The IMF the Bank of International Settlements etc who use their power to drain and stifling growth in what is ironically called the "developing world" and which in turn puts such pressures on the West to seriously threaten its social and national cohesion .
this is part of the New World Order's Illuminati/Committee of 300 Satanic plan for One World Government.
This situation is far way from inevitable - it is very much an engineered scenario.

Bush is an Illuminist ,Order and Skull and Bones Traitor to the American People.

2007-07-11 16:06:59 · answer #2 · answered by celvin 7 · 2 0

I agree with you completely. However there is another aspect in all of this. Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations#National_IQ_estimates. The intellect of the peoples of these countries is so low that it will be impossible to drag them up out of their morays. Their poverty and hunger is caused by their lack of intellectual ability to do anything.

Granted, the greed of these huge corporations comes into play, but if these indigenous people were intelligent, they would not allow it to happen. This is a two sided coin.

2007-07-15 19:26:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

No one is starving in Poland yet the U'K has still been flooded with over 600,000 poles in just two years. It all comes down to money and job opportunities. The grass is always greener.

2007-07-11 16:03:45 · answer #4 · answered by cobra 7 · 1 0

The definition of globalization is taking resources from first world countries to give to third world countries. But other countries' poverty and hunger are not our problems. Politicians are not going to punish their sponsors.

2007-07-11 15:56:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

People wouldn't come here if there were no jobs or money to be made. You can punish corporations that hire illegals, but the majority of "illegal users" are individuals who hire their personal gardeners, babysitters, housekeepers, day-laborers, etc.

2007-07-11 16:09:02 · answer #6 · answered by Sabine É 6 · 1 1

Australia here I come!

2007-07-11 16:14:27 · answer #7 · answered by Who Loves Ya Babe 4 · 3 1

dang ur a really angry white girl...take some midol

2007-07-11 16:44:27 · answer #8 · answered by CRYSTY 1 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers