Are you going to look into 9/11 or just call people names?

Question

Let me start out by saying. There are a lot of theories. What is important are the facts. So listen up before you try and tell me "that's been debunked" and "I saw planes". Your contempt and inability to process information only proves your willingness to be controlled by propaganda and government sponsored lies. You know what I am talking about. Things like weapons of mass destruction, later twisted into well he was a bad man and we are just going to justify it. We are all better off now.

Listen to me 9/11 was a pretext for war. The evidence was destroyed in a timely manner, It was said the those who funded the attacks are of little practical significance. I say we should have a criminal investigation and look into that.

9/11: Press for Truth
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3979568779414136481

A New Standard for Deception
http://www.freedom-fight.net/standard

I posted this in general environment because this effect everyone.

Answer 1

I know the holocaust happened. I also know that there were govt. plans to carry out terror attacks on American soil back in '63 (google: Operation Northwoods). I know that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident never happened (this has been declassified if you want to read it yourself) and thus causing 58,000American troops their lives, and 1.5million Vietnamese men, women and children's deaths. I know from a years worth of studying and researching that 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB. The official story has been debunked. Why don't you people (specifically the first 9 who answered) google video up: David Ray Griffin 9/11 the myth and the reality and knock some sense into yourselves.

I'm tired of all this BS conspiracy nut, kool-aid drinkin, tinfoil hat wearing crap from all these people who look for others for their answers. Why don't you get off your butts and do some reading.

Answer 2

NO, yet I did see the plains hit the homes, I did hear Bin encumbered and his butchers tell CNN, they'll kill each American they'd, women people toddlers it did no longer count. i recognize they have tried to attack countless extra cases interior the states on account that 9/11 however the Bush regulations have prevented and repelled such assaults. i recognize that on account that 9/11 Briton has been hit, Spain has been hit, Paris replaced into basically approximately burned to the floor, all via the Muslims butchers, so tell me what's the 9/11 certainty stream, does it let us know all of us imagined this, or does it say the President no longer purely attacked his very own united states yet France, Spain, and the united kingdom besides. Sounds kinda stupid does not

Answer 3

Do you really think, that our government was able to convince 10,15,19 however many men to hijack a plain and crash them into buildings. What could possible have been the incentive? What do you bribe someone with to get them to kill themselves in a fireball? As to you commit about a pretext for war, Its just not true, are you saying that bin laden and the rest are all working for our own government?

Answer 4

Why is this piece of trash in the Environment section. It should be under Stupid Propaganda, or If You Believe This, I Have Some Land In Florida You Might Be Interesed In.

Answer 5

All that was missing was the violin
Nero played that after he had burned Rome and blamed it on the jews so that he could feed his lions
with out political repercussions
history repeats itself

Answer 6

It is funny that people in this country still feel it is beyond the possibilities for our government to instigate, manufacture, or present false information to achieve their desired results or fullfill their agenda. Obviously people dont' pay attention to history in this country.

Its understandable given the history of our country and how we get the American public to support going to war, it usually takes a galvanizing and unifying event like, what is normally quoted from the PNAC document "A new pearl habor". In the early days of our country (manifest destiny) settlers went west and were invited into mexico to settle "tejas". They were given land and mexican Citizenship. They didn't like their level of say in the government and revolted against Mexico and santa Anna's army. People died and james k. Polk said "American Blood has been shed on American soil" and sent the US army into Mexico and destroyed Santa Annas Army (and a military school for kids aged 10-13-a monument to a 13 year old boy who draped himself in the Mexican flag and threw himself from the wall still stand s in Mexico today). We got texas, new mexico, Arizona and California, problem is they were Mexican citzens in Mexican territory not American. in the Spanish American War, the Battleship Main blew up in Havannah harbor, we blamed in on the Spanish and the American Public demanded justice and (cried "remember the Main!)we went to war and got Cuba, guam, Phillipeans etc,thanks to Teddy R. Rough riders and the charge up San juan hill. We installed a corrupt puppet governement that caused Castro to come to power, and cry "this time we will be invited to the revolution!" A few weeks later the claim about Spain's involvement was retracted, it was actually a coal bunker and munitions explosion common in that class of battleship, but by that time we were already at war. then the delay of acknowledgment in Japan's declaration of war, which left us unprepared for the Attack on pearl Harbor and got us into WWII. We had been suplying the allies with equipment but wanted something to trigger the American Public into agreeing with putting "boots on the ground". So, 9/11 being and inside job to get the public incited to go to war is understandable given our past record.

Answer 7

Nah it's just the same dumb asses calling people names.

Answer 8

OK, so tell us where Barbara Olsen is hiding out. And where American Airlines is hiding that 757. Lloyds of London might like to get their money back.

Answer 9

I'll just call people names. That's much closer to the truth than all that conspiracey dreck.

Answer 10

I have looked into 9/11 allot.When I first heard about the conspiracy "theory",I thought it was crazy and stupid too. Saying that, I watched 9/11 revisited and 9/11 mysteries,thinking it was going to be wrong. After watching I realized that this makes more sense than the official story. Now I have watched many documentaries and read a few books,and there is no doubt in my mind. It was easier when I didn't know and was just able to dismiss it,so I guess I understand why people name call....I have posted this before but it is good.......

Five Reasons To Deny 911 Was An Inside Job

By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
2-25-7
http://www.rense.com/general75/five.htm

1.Comfort.
Comfortable people do not dissent. They rarely question authority, unless overwhelmed by fleeting pangs of conscience or momentary madness. Why would any self-satisfied comfortable person want to discomfort themselves? The whole purpose of a comfortable person is to acquire more comfort or to ensure a perpetual state of comfort. Why would comfortable people, contented with their place in the world--
a comfortable home, a well-paid job, respect within their community--
want to upset that equilibrium? Why would any comfortable person question his government about circumstances he cannot control? Why risk discomfort, disapproval, suspension from work and community scorn simply to question something like 911 that cannot be changed? To a comfortable person, that makes no sense at all.
2. Complacency.
Complacent people rarely make waves, create dissension, cause an uproar. They prefer not to talk about politics and religion, nor to do any independent thinking. Because a complacent mind is a safe mind. Complacent people prefer "to get along to go along," to swim with the tide, to run with the herd, to blow with the wind. They like to mind their own business which, on the face of it, seems like common sense and the safe thing to do. Because to get passionately involved in any cause or belief
(aside from sports)
would require a lapse of complacency. Complacency, unlike comfort, requires a more practiced inertia. To accept the state or the status quo, with mild complaint--
but only the mildest, acceptable complaint--and plod along like herd animals. To dare question the state, or debate popular consensus, is not only foolish and insane but borderline treasonable to the complacent citizen.
3. Cowardice
Cowardice is the most understandable of denials of 911. It is convenient to deny 911 out of fear, because to do otherwise, to look at the evidence presented by the most powerful empire in the world, requires a heretical leap of independent thought. A mental insurrection worthy of revolutionaries, pioneers, patriots and outraged citizens. But cowards cannot sift the evidence and arrive at an independent conclusion. They have been beaten and cowed and, at most, can only cringe and howl in derision from the rear. At every original thought or contrary opinion
(contrary to the state and the corporate media that is),
they howl and scurry away, anonymously. At best, their children may lead them, by example, into a braver realm of thought.
4. Conviction
Conviction--to be convinced of one's rightness---
and the courage to assert it, is admirable even if one is proven wrong eventually. A great many believers
(in the official story)
are as convinced of the Kean Commission version of 911, as we skeptics are of their error. These believers claim, with many, many intelligent professionals to back up their claims, that steel does weaken and melt from fuel fires and big buildings do indeed collapse, that falling concrete does indeed pulverize into micro-sized dust particles, that incompetence does not necessary indicate evil.
We truthers, in turn, claim the mass of incriminating evidence overwhelms the experts and trumps their testimony. So who is more right? Time will tell. But the only way we will ever convince these true believers
(our co-workers, friends and family)
of the falsity in the official, government version of 911 is to show them what a lying, poisonous, murderous, mercenary, fear-mongering, war-mongering, fascistic group they have put their faith in. And every day more and more disgruntled citizens are becoming convinced we may have a point.
5. Collusion
A secret activity undertaken by two or more people for the purpose of FRAUD.
The definition of collusion. The US media colludes every day. They collude with the White House or Pentagon or State Department to perpetrate some fraud or other. And many of us collude right along with them. The smallest group of 911 deniers, numbering several million, which I call the Colluders, includes many who have worked for the US government, still work for the US government, receive huge chunks of money from that government to fund their work, depend on contracts from the US government and, more often than not, support the official US government line. Many of them, working high in the US government--NSA, FBI, CIA, Pentagon officials---
know exactly what happened on 911 but keep quiet. Colluding all the way to the bank. Privately they may not agree with many aspects of the official version but, publicly, they will NOT utter a single statement, will NOT go on record, publicly, with a single dissenting word. Not while there is money to be made. And so, of all the 911 deniers, they are most complicit with the crime.
Comfort. Complacency. Cowardice. Conviction. Collusion. And sometimes a combination of all of them.
Footnote: A tip of the cap to those activists at 911Blogger.com Not only do I read the columns posted there but the remarks (an addiction) and sneers from the trolls. This column is dedicated to the 911 activists everywhere, in recognition of the five types of people you run up against every day--and I mean against.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------