The ACLU has already taken the first step down that road to hell by supporting the legalization of computer generated movies and images of sex acts portraying the unspeakable. The images are supposedly so realistic that it would take an expert to know the difference. The argument that this is a harmless outlet for sick impulses has proved to be wrong. Instead, it just helps their diseased minds grow even sicker. And bring on the thumbs down. Many of you jumped on the bandwagon to defend homosexuality. Learn how to read and respond to the question asked. The question mentioned nothing about your sexual practice. It was a legitimate question asking where is a line finally going to be drawn that says some things are morally wrong in every situation, no matter what, no exceptions. As long as you are a defender of situational ethics, remember that when something does finally "offend" you, wave your tolerance banner. I will not, as I believe in an absolute code of ethics. I may have to concede some things are legal, but I will never concede they are right. This is not what our founding fathers meant to defend. Help me Lord! I am agreeing with an Atheist Dino.
2007-07-10 21:18:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by One Wing Eagle Woman 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Since im a guy and im not that old, i would say these people need a psychotherapist or something so they can get rid of these sick perverted fantasies, but then i might be a hypocrite for saying so, as i support tolerance(learned integrity from atticus finch). So, if they get their way, i would tolerate these perverts, but suggests that they need to understand that what they are doing is a bad thing-think of the children, you dont want them to be scared for life. Say they can only do their stuff with the kids consent. Hopefully, they will see the light(if the gov assigns psychotherapists to each 1 of them, they might just become normal again, since perverts usually get their start from being shy as a kid...)
2007-07-10 19:31:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by JN 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No... when it comes to NAMBLA, there is judgement involved because it involves children who are unable to make an informed choice about what is happening to them. Therefore, it is entirely different than gay marriage (two consenting ADULTS) or even homosexuality in general.
Because their very existence violate laws in all states, they'd better not get protection from the government. That, to me, would be as wrong as banning gays from marrying and banning abortion.
2007-07-10 19:23:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rogue Scrapbooker 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
donning this shirt is asserting plenty greater advantageous than "howdy, i admire goofy shirts" and that's barely assisting to propagate the effortless stereotype that gay persons are pedophiles. I also have a sturdy thought! Get a shirt with Goofy on it. L
2016-09-29 12:10:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If religious get their way...why shouldn't NAMBLA too? Both are sick negative organizations which shouldn't exist.
rlrose63
"No... when it comes to NAMBLA, there is judgement involved because it involves children who are unable to make an informed choice about what is happening to them."
LOL from the way you said it, it is exactly equal to religion.
2007-07-10 19:24:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
I think you are implying that liberals in the government will bend to pressure in the name of "tolerance." I am not sure it will get THAT far, though.
2007-07-10 19:24:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Huh... whenever I say to myself, "That is the most ignorant person I have ever seen." Someone comes along and proves that ignorance knows no limits.
2007-07-10 19:30:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
You don't seem to understand that pedophilia has nothing to do with sex. It only has to do with power. It is much the same as rape. And that will never be legalized.
2007-07-10 19:25:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Hopefully you're not implying what I think you're implying and you're one of those idiots who think homosexuality is comparable to pedophilia. How the hell can you compare what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home to an adult man taking advantage of a child? The difference is consent. You are really sick
btw toleration isn't a word you dumbass
2007-07-10 19:24:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by lindsey p 2
·
3⤊
4⤋
Pederasty isn't my area of expertise or knowledge, is it yours?
If I had a son I wouldn't want him having sex with an adult, same if I had a daughter, paedophilia seems to be abusive to me.
But I'm just a regular gay guy in a consenting, adult, long-term, gay relationship... so what would I know?
2007-07-10 19:26:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by CHEESUS GROYST 5
·
3⤊
3⤋