I think that we have enough taxes (taken from someone elses post)
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax,
Fuel permit tax
Gasoline Tax (42 cents per gallon)
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Interest expense
Inventory tax
IRS Inter est Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax
Road usage taxes
Sales Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
Unemployment Tax (SUT A)
Telephone federal excise tax
Telephone federal universal service fee tax
Telephone federal, state and local surcharge taxes
Telephone minimum usage surcharge tax
Telephone recurring and non-recurring charges tax
Telephone state and local tax
2007-07-10
10:46:07
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Beauty&Brains
4
in
Business & Finance
➔ Taxes
➔ United States
Telephone usage charge tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
Ron Paul sounds better and better everyday!!!
2007-07-10
10:46:44 ·
update #1
No. THere is no plan B. We are effed.
2007-07-10
11:05:44 ·
update #2
LOttery Tax !! LOL
Casino winnings tax!!!
2007-07-10
11:06:43 ·
update #3
IF the IRS was being honest with us perhaps we would have some positive things to say.In my retirement now and currently faced with additional tax due on my husband's social security benefits [even though he has had S.S. taxes (f.i.c.a.) taken out of his payroll checks for over forty years]they have the nerve to insist that I combine my pension check, (which came from the fruit of my labor and is actually seperate property in retirement ) with his benefits on the social security worksheet inside of 1040, "BECAUSE WE JUST SO HAPPEN TO SHARE THE SAME REPORTING LINE,16b", to determine how much more it is to be taxed...? For several months now we have been defending ourselves against this unfair tax in the first place because "SOCIAL SECURITY IS A VOLUNTARY PROGRAM- NOT MANDATORY". What is more shocking is that IRS is not legally suppose to send a deficiency notice unless a taxpayer is liable for taxes according to subtitle A (which does not apply to most of us anyway,) and "HIDDEN WITHIN " SUBTITLE C, the only section on the employment tax that confirms who is liable for taxes- you will be suprised! Had we not taken the "TIME" to research for ourselves (with the tremendous help of this article and finding it to be true in our situation) we would've been left to except what they tell us,the danger is what they don't tell us:and ,that we are paying their salaries to" HARASS" and keep secrets from us by using fraudulent tactics which have no legal foundation. They are required to publish "LEGAL" C.O.F.R.(codes of federal regulations) on the internet but they are not going to tell you where they are because they will not be able to continue to "TAKE" our money. We are much older than many of you ,(including many IRS representatives who are rocking in the same boat as we are)do yourselves a favor and get "TAX EDUCATED". We learned the "CONSTITUTION" in school--GET IT OUT! and using this article as a guideline for your understanding, you will see for yourself. Then, COMPLAIN,! COMPLAIN !, to your congressman. No wonder social security is running out of money(at least the social security we know it as ) Many of us are complaining about the WAR but are we "BLINDLY" contributing to it because IRS (via. false claims, threats,intimidation, and illegal collections) is being used as a "VEHICLE" and sweat off our backs to keep it funded........?
type in: www.agenturus.org/IRSFraud.htm The title of the article is: " So, you want to know the truth about America's tax laws & tax system". Pay close attention to page#27. The present and '"FUTURE" social security and pension benefits you save and have worked over half your life for,......MAY BE YOUR OWN! Protect your parents!
Just for yor Encouragement , I forgot to mention that we did locate (2) C.O.F.R laws relating to our situation that the IRS tried earlier to conceal
2007-07-10 15:09:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by skyy 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
I'm all for Ron Paul. He's our only hope. The Federal Reserve along with the Income Tax were both illegally ratified back in 1913 when the big bankers from Europe bought off a few politicians to put it into play.
There is no law stating that the average hard working American needs to pay income tax. Former IRS agents tried finding the law, and when they didn't, they resigned. JFK tried abolishing it, looked what happened shortly after.
The Federal Reserve has taken the powers from the government to make money. They did so by using the gold in Ft. Knox as collateral. So now they have the powers to make money out of thin air. That's why there's the income tax (to pay off the debt). That's why we're borrowing $3Billion a day from China. That's why our dollar has the spending power of 4cents when compared to the dollars worth back in 1913.
2007-07-10 17:54:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ted S 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
I do believe you will get a lot of democrats to tell you yes - you will get a few centrist republicans to tell you yes
Then whats left is the real people that count - they will tell you the right answer - NO
we went nearly 140/150 years without income tax as we know it today - we did quite well for ourselves
While you have a few that dont exist - the point certainly gets across
Oh - there is an alternate plan - dan imperato is going to try and run on the libertarian ticket - so if RP doesnt make it we still have a second chance
2007-07-10 15:26:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by jimkearney746 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I am not an expert at any of this but since the early 1990's I have known that the IRS was a fraud since it's inception.
Years ago there was a company in Montpelier, Vermont called Oscar and Zekes named after two pets that the cafe owner/CPA owned for awhile. I worked for this guy and after much research into the various laws and truths I made the conclusion that I was not liable for the income tax and therefore made copies for him to read at his leisure including a W-4 exemption signed statement and a Publication 515 copy for him also plus all relevant documentation. Everything pointed to the truth. His response was he violently threw down the stapled papers on the cafe floor and told me face to face that this was all propaganda. That was around 1996-1997 I believe. In 2001 before flying to Maui, Hawaii I was a Palmer Alaska McDonalds maintenance employee and this time I faxed 54 sheets of paper to McDonalds corporation with a signed W-4 exemption certificate with the express desire to withdraw my consent for having taxes withheld from my paychecks. McDonalds not only violated my civil and human rights but kept right on deducting from my pay as though I never sent them any documentation. All these years I have been trying to gather the nerve to do this again to assert my rights not to be taxed illegally but 99% of all employers are woefully ignorant and the response would be "Fine if you do not comply with these requirements and paperwork we cannot consider you for employment." That's how stupid these corporate people are. They are too afraid to stand up and know the real laws regarding the income tax and who it really applies to. Or wait maybe they all the truth and don't care to stand up for the rest of us. Either way it's a disgusting,unfair evil mess.
2014-09-28 12:11:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you know that the USA didn't have a income tax and probably not any of those taxes for I believe the first 160 years of our existence. The whole government operated on tariff taxes on imports. I sometimes think to myself that we have gotten ourselves in a qaundry of a situation, just think we have the number one economy in the world and the best consumers in the world so shouldn't importers want access to this dynamic market, yes they do and they will pay, of course it will be passed on to the consumer but still I would prefer that they pay to get access so you would see some manufacturing come back to the USA because a manufacturing job will create 16 other jobs and a country with manufacturing jobs is a better balance.
2007-07-10 14:22:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
It would be very nice if some of these PH D economists could take the time to research how Japan became so wealthy in such a short time, without taxing the workers.
1. Very high import tax on all finished products. {Raw materials were excluded from taxation}
2 However, the main method Japan used was to tax company profits only, no tax to the millions of individual workers.
Of course this sounds crazy to the greedy American 1% who make millions each & every year off the backs of their employees.
History has shown prices, wages,& inflation remained relatively 'Stable' under the U. S. Gold standard.
I'm counting on Ron Paul to fix this economic mess when we get him elected.
And to all you nay-sayers out there do you want a loaf of bread to cost $100 in 10 years, gasoline $50 a gallon?
Elect Ron Paul he's our only chance!
********************************************************
2007-07-10 14:46:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by beesting 6
·
7⤊
0⤋
No! The income tax is a huge drain on the U.S. economy. In addition to it's cost of operation, the IRS imposes huge and very burdensome compliance costs. It's rules are complex and so poorly written that if you send your tax return to ten different preparers, probably no two will come back with the same result. American companies spend vast amounts of their resources filling out forms. Business decisions are made based on tax consequences instead of how to create value for stockholders.
2007-07-10 14:21:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by quag 1
·
5⤊
0⤋
The feds have to tax heavily because they have taken on so much "responsibility", centralized in Washington, DC. Its gotten to the point where the phrase "the government can't afford tax cuts" and similar horrors are heard when programs are threatened. The government can't afford it??? What about the rest of us? We can't afford the government!
Getting back to only the Constitutionally mandated responsibilities of the federal government (national defense, tariffs, promoting commerce between the states) and leaving the rest to the states, where it belongs, would put the IRS out of work. I say let's do it!
2007-07-10 14:43:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by MIKE F. 3
·
6⤊
0⤋
This country ran for the first 140 years on a tariff from goods being brought into this country. Thry didn't have deals pitting one country against another. Then having to appease something else. Thats what Ron Paul needs to do now. Just have the same tariff for every item for every country. If you want to have an adjustment for the currency fluctations then so be it.
Also for all the Ron Paul supporters out there. Dr Paul now has more cash on hand than John Mccain. Mccain is on the way down. Dr Paul going up.
2007-07-10 11:09:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
1
2017-02-19 12:59:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You left out 9/11 tax when you buy a plane ticket. The worst is the marrige license. Marrige is the frigging scam of the ages!
2007-07-10 15:56:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋