English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have let a few guys touch my breasts and they always want to go further but I never let them. For me I am very able to handle my urges. since I have so many other outlets for t hose kinds of feelings. I think guys need to touch and even put their mouth and face against breasts for intamacy. so is it ok to let someone you are dating to have that intamacy with you?

I would never have sexual intercourse or oral or manual stimulation with a guy without being married, but kissing and letting him touch my breasts seems to be good enough to him, and something to tide us over until marriage.

I wouldn't advise this for girls who can't control themselves though. I think breasts are a more inocent form of intamacy whereas sexual encounters bring you into a whole other world of issues and that only belongs in marriage.

So what do you other christians out their think about this?

Just curious.

2007-07-10 04:02:29 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

I think breasts are maternal and have an innocent connotation to them and letting a guy cuddle up and lay his head on them, or suck on the nipple isn't abig deal as long asyou tell him in advance that you are not going to do an yt hing else with him in a sexual way. i see you're points but oh well. I still will continue doing what I feel is right. Thanks anyway.

2007-07-10 04:25:13 · update #1

13 answers

I'm a normal Christian (like 94% of America's professing Christians... not to be confused with the ignorant and repressive 6% who comprise the PSEUDO-Christians of the RRR Cult -- the "Religious Radical Right.")

An RRR Cult lemming would probably criticize you, but take that with a BIG grain of salt, if it happens. The advice of those ignoramuses isn't worth a flying hoot.

There is not the **least bit** wrong with what you're doing, and you both are having a lot of really exciting and harmless fun. So GO for it, and don't feel at all guilty.

2007-07-10 04:22:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Fondling Breasts

2016-10-02 22:26:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, I'm a guy, so I guess I would feel neglected somehow if my gf didn't share that with me...but it IS a sexual act nonetheless...but obviously not as committal as intercourse...which Christians would say save til marriage...but I don't know...A lot of Christians I know LIVE/LIVED together before they were married...and I doubt seriously that there is NO sort of sexual activity going on there...If not, why bother living together...

2007-07-10 04:07:45 · answer #3 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 3 0

I think you are obviously still very young and naive. Good for you for trying, but unless you get married straight out of high school, that will not tide you over until marriage. And don't get married straight out of high school just so you can do more than that.

I highly suggest you read the book "Intimate & Unashamed" by Scott Farhart M.D. He is a christian doctor and has better stuff to say then you will get from anyone else.

2007-07-10 04:09:48 · answer #4 · answered by arzachel81 2 · 2 1

I'm a born again christian, but unfortunately I'm am not a virgin. So keep yours. I had no self -control that day and I just let it happen. It lasted 10 min. but it still changed my life. So letting a guy suck your breast is not a sin. Especially if done right.

2007-07-10 04:08:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

A thing to think about is if you are encouraging another person to sin. And no, guys do not need to touch you to feel intimate. If they tell you that, they are either too young to believe differently, or lying.
Ask yourself the purpose of intimacy of this kind. Remember that relationships are not recreational. (If they were they wouldn't make babies and break your heart.)

2007-07-10 04:11:11 · answer #6 · answered by ashleyok 2 · 0 1

first of all i'm not a fanatic crhristian and i'm againsts waiting to ger married in order to have sex. i think you're just giving those guys a little something all adults need so that the relationship will keep going. i dont think it' a sin, but you shouldn;t rap it up like that, you know "other forms of intimacy" and such. you just compromise your beliefs. i'd go for all or NOTHING, but hey, that's just me.

2007-07-10 04:09:50 · answer #7 · answered by metafrastria 4 · 2 1

actually its very hard to combine between religion (i.e Sin) and life (sex needed)...

everything is happened before marriage (something that related with sex needed ) are consider as a sin in religion. but, i think, ur way to keep ur virginity b4 marriage is a good thing. to have some intimacy is ok within still in under control...

2007-07-10 04:17:48 · answer #8 · answered by Alex Lin 1 · 0 1

First of all intimacy has nothing to do with physical touching. I has to do with all of the things that make that other person want you even more. Like talking, LISTENING, laughing, candles. Basically creating a calm, loving environment that produces sex. Any man that says that he wants to be intimate with your breast just wants to have sex and that is all.

2007-07-10 04:09:35 · answer #9 · answered by haywardn32 2 · 0 1

im sorry honey but i think that is still a sin! either ur a good girl or not? i think if ur lettin guys fill you up n not letting them do more or ur not giving anything in return makes u a c**k tease!!!!!

2007-07-10 04:17:50 · answer #10 · answered by talulamae818 1 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers