English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have a standard sky box in my lounge with 2 RF aerial outlets via an amplifier/splitter (1 to a bedroom, 1 to a family room). In both additional rooms I have a 'sky eye' which allows the changing of channel in either room, this has always worked fine as the two additional TV's are standard.
I have since purchased an LCD TV for my family room but the picture is often distorted by the appearance of ghosting/dragging lines when characters move. I have tried an attenuator to weaken the RF aerial signal and the addition of another booster but neither seems to improve the picture. Any ideas on how to achieve a clear picture - would the answer be an AV wireless signal sender which apparently transmits through wall etc.

2007-07-09 21:51:50 · 4 answers · asked by Jackie H 1 in Consumer Electronics TVs

4 answers

nothing to do with aerials, its a fact that lcd always has ghousting/lagging on fast moving motions. Its just the technology. Without getting to boring and technecilly minded.

wg

2007-07-10 20:42:02 · answer #1 · answered by wondergeezer 6 · 0 0

No it would not help but you should ask where you bought the LCD as it maybe that you require a different type of aerial.

My LCD picture does this sometimes but we live in a weak transmission area and have a booster attached to the normal aerial input point. This might also be an option for you to consider...not dear to buy..

2007-07-10 04:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This is all down to the "response time" of your LCD screen. The response time is measured in milliseconds and relates to how long it takes to refresh each pixel (picture element or dot) on the screen. Top range LCD screens have response times of 2 milliseconds or better; I have seen some as slow as 20 milliseconds. You only get what you pay for!

2007-07-12 16:59:53 · answer #3 · answered by Michael B 6 · 0 0

i doubt it,some LCD TV have a slow processor which causes the ghost effect,it can't keep up with the picture worse on sports,as for the attenuator i would remove it unless your next to a transmitter you don't need it

2007-07-10 05:05:29 · answer #4 · answered by clark kent 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers