I have received some very constructive answers, and a few questions that have asked why I (a) admit no apparent reason for this raid and (b) who this stalker is. In answer to (a) I have never been a drug dealer/user/associate of drug dealers/users and have had info from police that they did 'not do their homework' in cross-referencing their information in relation to reports of drug-dealing/possession at my home (ie, there was none whatsoever) with reports of my harassment by that of my stalker; nor did they observe my home for evidence of drug-dealing/taking activity; and (b) my stalker is the ex-husband of my older sister, with whom I've never had a sexual or romantic relationship. Therefore, pls do not make the judgement that it is all in relation to compensation - it's to do with the fact that I feel aggrieved that the word of a criminal can be taken above mine without any real, proper or substantiated evidence, merely that he can make a few malicious phone calls. Pls advise.
2007-07-09 13:20:07 · 5 answers · asked by oasis 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
stalking is now against the law...if you can document in what ways he is doing this and try to have witness when possible or phone calls recorded, then you can turn him in and have some info to back you up so the authorities won't think you're just paranoid. if you truly think you might be in danger, don't wait for documentation...call them now and report him! listen to your gut feelings on this. years ago i was stalked for several months, before it was a crime to do so, it's very scary...much luck to you, and be careful.
2007-07-09 13:39:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
interior the U.S., there's a federal statute [a million] that enables you to sue whilst your rights have been violated (working example, the drug squad carried out an unlawful raid on your place). you could sue the guy officers who violated your rights [2], and you may even sue the community police branch itself if some sturdy coverage or practice lead on your rights being violated [3]. There are 2 catches: the 1st is that your rights could have incredibly been violated. on the information provided, it incredibly is perplexing to make certain. in many circumstances, if police won a seek warrant (even a warrant later desperate to be invalid [5]) ahead of the raid, then the raid became legal and your rights weren't violated (i.e. you could no longer sue). in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, if the officers lied or recklessly handed over the actuality so as to obtain the warrant [6], or if the officers somewhat could have primary that the information that they had did no longer set up possibly reason to have self belief that your place contained drugs or drug paraphernalia [7], or if the warrant itself became grossly invalid [8], your rights would have been violated. and you would be in an stunning place in case you could coach they did no longer have a warrant in any respect. the 2d seize is a few thing talked approximately as "qualified immunity" ("QI" for short). if your defendants (meaning, anybody you finally end up suing) can get QI, meaning they have the stunning to have the lawsuit at modern brushed aside [9]. Defendants can obtain QI if the regulation does not "needless to say set up" [10] that their particular habit interior the raid violated your rights [11]. and in spite of if the regulation became "needless to say generic, the defendants are allowed to make a "clever mistake" approximately what the regulation demands [12] and nevertheless obtain QI. i'm no longer an legal expert (or possibly a regulation student or paralegal), so be sure to refer to a civil rights legal expert to get a real opinion. wish that enables!
2016-09-29 09:56:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would write a letter of complaint and ask for reassurances that the police would change their course of actions and fully investigate before jumping in with two left feet. They have enough information on their databases to cross reference any past history/convictions on people at your address, not only your name.
2007-07-09 13:38:00 · answer #3 · answered by christine m 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the ex husband is trying to cause trouble for your family, this accusation is a massive stab in the dark, going on your responses. pay no attention and let the old bill know if it carries on, he'll get an harrasment charge.
2007-07-09 13:33:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know the saying their is no smoke without fire.You got into it baby then get out of it.
2007-07-09 14:40:17 · answer #5 · answered by realdolby 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋