where would be the safest place to live over the next 30-50 years??
2007-07-09 11:41:08 · 15 answers · asked by Almost freeee 3 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
I'm looking ofr specific locations. None of the answers so far are good. 'Nowhere' or 'Mars' or 'inland' is not what I'm lookinf for.
2007-07-11 19:08:00 · update #1
Which scientists? Or are you talking about Al Gore?
2007-07-09 12:45:48 · answer #1 · answered by areallthenamestaken 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They use ice cores and estimate temperatures based on the quantity of carbon dioxide present day interior the ice. worldwide warming is genuine interior the sense that the temperatures are in a warming vogue. in spite of the undeniable fact that, there is not any conclusive evidence that it is not a common cyclic version interior the Earth's temperature. regrettably, the temperatures taken from the 1800's on are lots greater precise than the "estimates" and while not having the best measurements for previous temperatures, conclusive evidence will no longer be gained. Oh, and easily to permit you be attentive to in answer to 3 human beings's claims, there are scientific articles and many those that *do* project the assertions that people have a great effect in this. There are mutliple aspects in contact in worldwide warming, and extra and extra it looks like water vapor from the sea performs a miles better place than carbon dioxide, as this is the amplifying result. nonetheless, none of that's shown, and it nonetheless theory. regrettably we'd the two could desire to kick back off, or face the envisioned catastrophic outcomes of warming to truly be attentive to that's right. keep in mind, that those comparable scientists that declare to "be attentive to" approximately worldwide warming, additionally envisioned a hectic typhoon season this year. under are some citations, some could desire to be appeared up on pubmed so as to verify them. It truly dollars the thought no peer-reviewed scientific article has questioned human forcings as a clarification for worldwide warming, quite a few have, this is purely that they get pushed aside because of the fact they are no longer component to the sparkling-air schedule. unhappy because of the fact i think of maximum of them could nonetheless propose decrease emissions.
2016-10-01 06:21:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what we do about it... if we do nothing then everywhere is going to be more dangerous than it is now, weather will be much more unpredictable and it's hard to really comprehend the scale of the damage that will have occurred. Suffice to say that it will have a flow on impact, as those worse effected by flooding or drought flee their homes we'll start to see wars too.
If we switch the basis of our energy economy to geothermal power though we'll probably be alright although we still might see some bad effects of global warming at this stage because we have left things so damn late. Still it would make a huge difference and (unlike a lot of things suggested by hysterical environmentalists) is actually both affordable and practical.
2007-07-09 14:15:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Try the next 10 years. Somewhere inland, but near a lake about sea level.
2007-07-09 11:49:17 · answer #4 · answered by Cynthia G 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Right where you are should be just fine. Unless of course you want to make a complete fool of yourself, like some did with the "hole in the ozone" which was going to be the death of mankind, with everyone having skin cancer etc. No they sweep it under the rug, because its not convenient to mention that it was a lie. just like GW is a lie. Good luck, hope you don't move to the top of a mountain too soon,
2007-07-16 02:34:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mars
2007-07-09 12:35:55 · answer #6 · answered by Mystine G 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There's no safe place, because...
The biggest harm global warming will do is economic. Moving people away from the coast, replacing things lost due to flooding, fixing damaged agriculture. All this will cost hundreds of billions of dollars and may drive the world into a Depression that will make the 1930s look like good times.
It's _global_ warming. There's no place to hide.
2007-07-09 12:09:58 · answer #7 · answered by Bob 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Running from it will not solve the problem.Try
fixing it instead. Recycle. Conserve fuel.
So NO to plastic bags and non-recyclable bottles.
Turn off the TV. Plant a tree in your backyard
instead.
2007-07-14 18:02:50 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The best way to fight climate change is to donate to either a well known charity, or a non-profit carbon offsetter. Websites like www.CO2Debt.com screen charities for efficiency and allocate donations to them. You can look for other carbon offset programs, but a lot of them are for profit, Co2debt.com is a non profit group.
2007-07-09 12:54:53 · answer #9 · answered by lol s 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
somewere inland that is not near a lake or the sea and i mean miles inland!
2007-07-16 06:03:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋