If the "Bibles" of today, with all their versions and differences in the quantity of their "books" and "gospels", were in fact the Original Holy Word of GOD Almighty, then there would be no need for the Noble Quran. But since they are corrupt, then we obviously can't consider them as GOD Almighty's Holy and Divine Words. you agree?
2007-07-09 06:30:33 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No.
2007-07-09 06:34:04 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is foolish to consider ANY written book, whether Bible or Qur'an, to be the divine word of God, since God did not write anything and certainly would not write anything in any one language understandable by only a few. All translations are corrupt, whether of the Bible or the Qur'an, by definition. Any "modern" version of the Bible or the Qur'an is also corrupt, although it's because we now cannot understand the meanings of the words used in the original languages at the time they were written. We can only understand the words in their present-day meanings as we grew up learning them.
2007-07-09 06:38:24 · answer #2 · answered by thylawyer 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Discernment required; There is a difference between the 'Bible' and scriptures currently. The scriptures are 'given by inspiration of God' 2 Tim.3:16-17. Some of the 'additions' to the word of God is in the Bible. (Analogy; a test) It is also one place where divisions in Christianity comes from presently.
2007-07-09 07:05:10 · answer #3 · answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You might also consider that the committee that put the Bible together left out many of the books. Also keep in mind how many times the Bible has been translated from one language to another before finally making it to what people today call the "Holy Word of God."
I also find it interesting that the Bible is sometimes referred to a "The Cannon." There's that overtone of violence inherent in Christianity again.
2007-07-09 06:36:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ever for the reason that i grow to be little and til immediately i've got consistently referred to as my mum "Mummy" and my dad "Daddy". in basic terms because of the fact they in no way replied to "mum"/"dad". and it particularly is often caught, i think. comparable with my siblings, too. I swear every time my mom calls me at paintings, and that i answer asserting "hi, mummy", i'm getting the main strangest seems from my paintings colleagues. They consistently discover that hilarious and in many situations take the mic. and that i will certainly see why it particularly is humorous lol yet, it particularly is in no way replaced, and that i doubt it is going to. mom and father will consistently be Mummy and Daddy. And specifically because of the fact they gained't respond to something from their toddlers! : )
2016-12-10 06:46:03 · answer #5 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do people think only the Bible is corruptible. Why can't the Quran be corruptible as well?
2007-07-09 06:34:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are delusional. Look at all the evil being done in the name of the Quran. How do you explain that? Or maybe you don't consider it evil, which is even more frightening.
2007-07-09 06:34:04 · answer #7 · answered by Jeff A 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Where do you get your "facts" that it is corrupt? How can you get an honest answer when you don't give an honest question?
2007-07-09 06:35:20 · answer #8 · answered by Joshua B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is your basis for your charge of corruption?
2007-07-09 06:34:31 · answer #9 · answered by Privratnik 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i agree to anything you say if you promise not to blow me up.
2007-07-09 06:36:12 · answer #10 · answered by joe the man 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋