If 9/11 wasn't an inside job?

Question

Why aren't the firefighter who were on the scene yelling at the top of their lungs.

The first on the scene - police and fire fighters

Shouldn't they be the ones telling us it was a plane stupid ?

Why aren't they ?


Are they ?


Provide a link of the fire fighter - police in New York that say - It wasn't a bomb it wasn't an implosion it was a plane stupid

I'd like to see it I will watch it

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-972875032828177268&q=Proof+that+bombs&total=551&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

so far not one of you have provided the link to a fire fighter on the scene that said it was a plane not a planted purposeful explosion

\
\not one of you

Answer 1

For those of whom still want to deny the facts, which is inexcusable at this point, I ask you 2 questions...1) Why has there been no reasonable explanation for those explosions? 2) Why was the debris from the towers carted off before any investigation was done on what happened as it would be at any other crime scene? If you seriously subscribe to what the 9/11 Commission reported and what the gov't told us, then there is no hope for you, and I don't know if anybody would be able to convince you of otherwise. Perhaps you are too scared to seek the truth, to weed through the conspiracies and the stories the gov't told us. There is a medium which cannot be disputed if you've done any real research on it. Perhaps you just don't care enough about it. This is why it can happen again, and the way our gov't works, it probably will.

Answer 2

Just wanted to get some thumbs down and up.

Yes, the buildings fell from within. It was an inside job. Once the planes entered the buildings, they were inside the buildings and thus the events leading to the collapse occurred inside.

Unless the firemen or police saw the buildings actually struck by planes, how would they know that it was planes? They entered the building only knowing that something struck and people were inside that needed to get out. Firefighters that were going up to the floors that the planes landed in did not survive the collapse, so they can not report on actually seeing the plane inside the building...right?

Answer 3

If yo are wearing SCBA (Self Contained Breathing Apparatus) gear, any yelling would travel only a few feet. That is totally useless. The police and firefighters on the inside of the building cannot see the outside of the building so your argument there is gone. The various TV stations all carried the event LIVE so it was impossible to fake the attack.

In addition, the Muslims took credit for the attack so that would tend to rule out an inside job.

Why are you trying to look beyond reality to create a fantisy world to implicate people who are not involved?

Answer 4

i've actually seen the tape of WTC when the plane crash in it but i'm not sure which tower it was. the recording showed that the levels below blew up even when the floors hit by the plane were collapsing. i don't mean to offend anyone but i only tell what i saw. it's not logic a building that strong, built with concrete and steel at the centre could fall that easily without first planting TNTs and exploding it from the inside (like a demolision plan).

Answer 5

When the planes hit, there was obviously a lot of fire. You don't think that there was any flammable material in the towers that, when ignited, would sound like a bomb?

Just for the sake of argument, lets just say there were bombs. How does that prove it was an inside job? There is nothing to say who the "bombs," if they existed, where planted by. They could have been planted by the terrorists before the fact to aid in the destruction of the buildings.

I myself do not see enough evidence to support the conclusion that A.) there were bombs in the towers, and B.) it was an inside job.

Answer 6

Did you ever see that commercial for Sprite, or some soft drink, where they pour a refreshing liquid into a glass and it looks delicious, then you see that it is corn oil. They say "we can make anything look real on TV". That's what 9/11 is, a commercial filling our heads up with lies just like everything else on television. TV is a brainwashing technique to keep us at the dumbest brain level possible, and so is the 'news'.

Answer 7

OK, before I get to you and your question let me just respond to a couple of the more idiotic people on here.

"The Muslims took credit". What Muslims? All Muslims? I'm not a Muslim, but if I were, I'd be pretty pissed off at you morons. Bin Laden speaks and acts for all Muslims is that it?

By the way, the authenticity of the video where Bin Laden "takes credit", is seriously disputed by alot of people (and theyre not all crazy), and in fact, there is a released statement, also supposedly from Bin Laden, saying that he DID NOT plan or have anything to do with 9-11.

I'm a practical, no-bullsh*t kinda guy. There are two statements out, both supposedly from Bin Laden. And since I cant know for sure which one is actually from him, this "they took credit" argument carries no weight with me, and it shouldnt for anyone with a functioning brain and a truly unbiased view.


Had to mention that. Now, with regards to your question, I see what youre getting at. Youre saying that the people who were there first on the scene arent attacking the conspiracy theorists right? Thats true. I havent seen anything released from any one of the police or firefighters saying anything to that effect. But, to be fair, I havent seen anything from them either way. Seems theyre not saying much of anything on this subject.

However, if you have a link of firefighters or policeman saying that it WAS an inside job, I'd love to see it.

Now, I dont believe any of the conspiracy theories, because I dont believe anything that isnt proven. I look at this like a trial. conspiracy theories VS the governments story. I've looked at the conspiracy theories, and their evidence, for the most part, is circumstancial or so silly that it would never hold up in court. (I read one involving reptilian aliens.)

But the governments isnt much better. Their story is full of holes and things that dont make much sense. A passport from one of the hijackers found in the rubble down below? Are you f*ckin kidding me?

If theres one thing I hate, its having my intelligence insulted, and thats exactly what both the official story and many of the conspiracy theories do.

Both:

1) Are way too simple to be realistic.

2) Demand total belief in their side.

3) Insult my intelligence.

The official story says a bunch of rag-tag Saudis who were trained in the stone-age country of Afghanistan to fire 20-year old stolen Russian guns somehow all made it to the US, hijacked four airplanes with box-cutters and hit 75% of their targets.

One word: Bullsh*t.

Now, the most widely accepted conspiracy theory says that the government somehow planned the entire thing, placed bombs in the 3 buildings that collapsed without anyone noticing and fired a missile on the Pentagon while keeping the entire thing completely secret.

Sorry. That story isnt much better.


I think the truth lies in between those two stories. I dont know what it is, and I dont claim to. But I know I can find holes and a serious lack of hard evidence in both of them. And if theres one thing I've learned in my life, its that in 99% of situations, the truth isnt in black and white. The truth is that our world is made of up of hundreds of shades of dozens of colors, and seeing things in black and white makes men the same as dogs.


But, I do think that there are enough holes in the governments story to warrant a demand for a new, independent investigation of 9-11. And since over 70% of New Yorkers want one, I dont see why their demands should be ignored. I refuse to jump to conclusion based on circumstancial evidence though.


However, the one positive aspect of the conspiracy theories, is that they hit a nerve with many people and have exposed an underlying problem in our society. And that is the readiness of so many people to deny things that threaten their comfort. For many people, definite proof that 9-11 was an inside job would be a comfort-shattering revelation that couldnt be brushed aside. We live under this government every day, and to find out that they would do something like that to their own people would be unheard of. How do you think people would react? Thered be civil unrest like you wouldnt believe. Everyones peace, comfort and happiness would be impossible to retrieve after a revelation like that, and so, those people become vehemently opposed to any questions about 9-11, because deep down, theyre scared out of their minds that itll turn out to be true, because if it was, what would they do? Truth is they have no idea what theyd do, and that scares them sh*tless. They love their comfortable lives and thats why theyre so vitriolic and hateful in their denial.

I looked into the conspiracy theories because I'm very open-minded and what I found wasnt too impressive. But many people would rather bury their heads in the sand at just the mention of a conspiracy theory, and that is much more revealing than they think.


Anyways, thats my view on all this, and after a dissertation like that, I'd better get best answer!

Answer 8

Great video, and a very nice try! But, I am still seeing obstinacy in your first three answerers. Don't give up, though, none of us can give up! If you only get through to one person, each time, you are doing something! *sm*

Answer 9

yes it was a inside job

Answer 10

I think you're a little confused on the order things happened and which conspiracy took place where.