would you prefer to see the USA military on the streets of American cites fighting gangs or in Iraq?

Answer 1

Well most americans who die violently are killed by other americans so this would make sense.
When you look at the numbers foreign terrorists are a much smaller threat.

Answer 2

The choices are full of Bush propaganda and are not the kind of questions Americans who love this country should be asking...a wonderful structure we have has been corrupted by the total and complete breakdown in morals and ethics of our elected officials - our congress is the biggest whorehouse in the world and everyone and everything there is for sale to highest bidder....our failure of a Nation of high ideals and policies that enhance those ideals have contributed to the hatred of the rest of the world and our own people who see no way for this country to offer hope any longer....

Answer 3

I'd rather see the gangs fighting the streets in Iraq!!!

Answer 4

Imperialism or a police state isn't the only two choices that we face. In fact, the former tends to go together with the latter. I think we don't want the military wasted on imperialist pursuits and we don't want them patroling our streets. The majority of Americans do not want to see Nazi America arrive on the scene.

Answer 5

This so-referred to as "conflict" in Iraq isn't something extra advantageous than a nationally backed armed theft of yet another countrys wealth (oil). it is been a countrywide custom of the u . s . ever in view that previously we even grew to grow to be a rustic to rob different peoples (interior of sight individuals, Africans , Mexicans, Hawiians, Alaskans, ect..) of their land and organic components basically so the wealthy few here would desire to stay a life-time of luxurious. Then they make up some lame excuse why it became into justified and how the individuals who we slaughtered deserved it . The unfavourable human beings here do each and every of the battling and death and the wealthy basically sit down returned and get wealthy off the plunder. In that context, of course the conflict in Iraq does no longer be seen unlawful. it could be like asking Hitler if killing Jews became into unlawful. we can all meet our maker sometime and you will clarify it to Him why those form of civilians are death unnecessarily. be confident to point that each and every of the civilians which you basically bombed have been "collateral injury" and it became into all criminal because of the fact some oil employer offered off our flesh pressers to make it ensue. i'm confident he will understand and supply you a large pat on the returned and say "nicely carried out , soldier". via the way, the u . s . doesnt have any actual infantrymen. they're no longer something yet a collection of over paid mercenaries doing the bidding of the wealthy few. basically wait some years whilst the oil runs out and all of us commence killing one yet another basically for scraps of wood to burn for heat temperature interior the wintry climate. Then justice would be served on u . s . and the oil dependant countries who've foolishly wasted this efficient organic source and resorted to killing others and robbing them of their organic components. Hasta l. a. Vista , toddler !!

Answer 6

Technically speaking, they cannot be on the streets of the United States fighting gangs because of Federal law.

Personally, I would not want them to and that is the task of the police.

Answer 7

Where are you from? I'm in Los Angeles & the Military wouldn't know where to start & stop in this town! What would you have them do, kill everyone just because they were in the "wrong neighborhood"? I think I'd like to see YOU on the streets of Iraq, cuz you would never make it on the streets of my neighborhood!

Answer 8

That's a tough one, I think it might be safer in Iraq.

This is aside the fact that we'd have to go into martial law for them to actually fight gangs.

Answer 9

I know a lot of people are sick of the war but the war is in Iraq
instead of the USA. Regardless of what you think about Bush, we have not had a terrorist attack since 911, unlike Spain, France, England, Isreal, Pakistan and many more countries. Could it be that they are afraid to attack America?

Answer 10

You know what I say? **** the demoncrats and all you pinko commies. George Bush has done nothing but help our beloved country when we needed a leader. Bill Clinton was a dikhead just like all the other Demoncrats who are cutting funds to the military.