English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In George W. Bush's January 29, 2002 State of the Union Address, Iraq, Iran and North Korea were labeled as the Axis of Evil. At the time both Iran and North Korea were working with Nuclear Weapons Programs. Iran had been supporting terrorism since the 80's. So out of the three countries that make up the Axis of Evil we invaded Iraq. Wouldn't it have been a better plan to go after Iran instead of invading Iraq?

2007-07-08 13:17:49 · 9 answers · asked by Yahoo Sucks 5 in Politics & Government Military

For anyone who cares to claim that Iraq had WMD's and was supporting terrorism, Bush has stated that this was not the case. Don't believe me, see the link below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-c8Bf8LWWk&mode=related&search=

2007-07-08 13:18:06 · update #1

9 answers

All them UN sanctions made this adventure legal.

Don't you know how to play chess?

NATO to the east of me, US to the west, Holy crap were in the middle.

2007-07-08 13:32:59 · answer #1 · answered by Stand-up philosopher. It's good to be the King 7 · 0 1

Haha if you invade Iran you give the Iranian regime a justifiable right to have nuclear weapons.
Let me see...you mentioned there are 3 countries as axis of evil. Why didn't you suggest attacking North korea then ??? oh I guess because they have nuclear weapons now, Aw so you're scared to suggest attacking them at the comfort of your armchair...

By the way I'm not supporting Iran's regime, however watching what a mess Iraq's become after you invaded them. I guess you can't afford another war. specially since I'm gonna be against your side :P

2007-07-09 04:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by Arya 5 · 0 0

I think if USA is again trying to invade Iran or North Korea, one in my mind, whole people in this world should make a war with USA, since USA is more evil other than others. since USA will attack all out to your country and whole people will be victimised without any mercy and non-stop until they will satisfy if whole people in that country completely vanished.

All people around the world should form a union to encounter the evil force like USA and Israel and make mass high tech weapon for self defense against the USA offensive attack.

We should not make any mercy to any USA people in any condition. They should treat like a bandit.

2007-07-08 21:05:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

welllll, I see the "think tank" is alive(from the neck down) and kicking. skip and ESPECIALLY bush-hardy har har. Bush has NEVER been right. And Hell yea, lets just kick off WW3, I can only hope you guys are joking. I'm picking up more than a little Mepublican rhetoric from this site on more than a few occasions. I gotta go where thinking people go. "See Ya, wouldnt wanna be Ya"

2007-07-08 20:53:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The problem with Iran is the intelligence. They have underground missile silos. We know where most of them are and can easily target them and destroy them without problem. However, we don't know if we know where all of them are. We don't want to start a war and miss a couple of silos potentially carrying nuclear or biological weaponry. But yes, we do need to eventually attack Iran.

2007-07-08 20:32:18 · answer #5 · answered by nreep@sbcglobal.net 3 · 0 0

Heck yeah. We should keep right on going, and take out Russia and China on the way to North Korea. I'm sure we'd be able to manage all that. I mean, it's not like anybody's going to fight back or anything.

Plus, we'll be the talk of the town when we control half the world.

2007-07-08 20:21:47 · answer #6 · answered by skip742 6 · 0 2

Slow your roll, one terroristic regime at a time..

2007-07-08 20:22:58 · answer #7 · answered by LAVADOG 5 · 1 0

We should just do what our President Bush says, he hasn't been wrong so far!

2007-07-08 20:23:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

because we wanted saddam out of office

2007-07-08 20:27:44 · answer #9 · answered by simkvn64 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers