English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Its always the same..half brained remarks..some liberal with nothing better to do. by all Accounts this isnt even a war...its a routing out of Islamo Fascism ..Al Queda,..terriorism,..Bin Ladden...and all the rest of the cukoo cukoo birds...that call themselves Holy warriors,.. If Oil were the Issue,.the Country would have been shut-down ..and there would not be ...any efforts made by the USA or anyone else..to establish a free society. This conflict is not about Oil..its about Terrorism..geesh.

2007-07-08 13:16:17 · 16 answers · asked by Joseph 2 in Politics & Government Military

16 answers

It's the way of the "New Order" that's why! To spread the "New Order" around the world! That Bush said a safer Iraq means a safer West and for the world. That the Quran may be behind "The Cause" or the "Holy War!" That "they" have to kill to get into heaven! But I think it's the "other place" that "they" will go to! That the "New Order" is freedom for all nations! Strength and honor! =<)

2007-07-08 13:40:08 · answer #1 · answered by Sir Grandmaster Adler von Chase 7 · 1 1

Nice lie. He made that VERY ARGUMENT in entrance of the UN as probably the most predominant motives for going to conflict. Were you born the previous day, or have you ever simply been brainwashed by means of socialist propaganda? How unhappy. "Events can flip in one among 2 methods: If we fail to behave within the face of threat, the persons of Iraq will retain to are living in brutal submission. The regime could have new vigor to bully and dominate and overcome its pals, condemning the Middle East to extra years of bloodshed and worry. The regime will stay risky -- the neighborhood will stay risky, with little desire of freedom, and remoted from the growth of our occasions. With each step the Iraqi regime takes closer to gaining and deploying essentially the most horrible guns, our possess choices to confront that regime will slender. And if an emboldened regime have been to deliver those guns to terrorist allies, then the assaults of September the eleventh might be a prelude to a long way larger horrors. If we meet our tasks, if we conquer this threat, we will be able to arrive at an overly special long term. The persons of Iraq can shake off their captivity. They can at some point become a member of a democratic Afghanistan and a democratic Palestine, inspiring reforms during the Muslim global."

2016-09-05 19:48:13 · answer #2 · answered by stutsman 4 · 0 0

It's really about political stability in the region. We know that without it, Oil becomes a pawn. However the only way to get political stability is by ensuring Iraqi Freedom. It's all connected. Until Iraq is strong enough, militarily. There will be no stability. They will continue to be attacked and attacked long after we leave. Because the extremist muslims want the power. They want each Muslim Country to be run by cleric types so that there is no religious freedom. That is the true agenda of the terrorists in Iraq. We can't walk out...we have to finish. Every extremist in the world needs to know that Democracy and freedom of speech go together and that until every country in the world has that free society will fight and fight.

2007-07-08 13:29:42 · answer #3 · answered by stan s 1 · 3 1

Iraq peoples were better off before the invasion (if you removed the economic sanctions that were hitting them). So the intentions of preserving freedom is just a smoke screen that cost lives to a lot of Americans and Iraqi peoples. If you believed that the 500 billions $ spent for the Irak war will be paid with Iraq freedoms, then your nuts!!
I am not liberal or con, I just used rationality and brain power to come up with the evidence! US is there to put its interests in place and those interests, includes oil... Among other things. Freedom is quite far in priorities there, but since freedom bring free market economy, which also mean an economic advantages for American businesses in Iraq, then be it...

2007-07-08 13:27:16 · answer #4 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 3 1

There were no terrorist in Iraq before we invaded. The nuts and screwballs started arriving as Iraq fell into chaos.

Al Queda wasn't there either - neither was bin Laden....Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

Bush wants the oilfields...that is the reason he invaded the country. He thought he could sent the best trained, best equipped military in the world into Iraq, kill Saddam and march the military to the oilfields to take control.

Imagine his suprise!

If he could just get rid of those pesky insurgents, stop all that fighting stuff between Sunni and Shi'ia, he could run right over and lock in the oilfields.

He is an idiot....and the biggest terrorist in the world. It took Saddam 30 years to kill 300,000 Iraqis....it has taken Bush only 5 years to kill almost one million.

Who is the terrorist?

2007-07-08 14:36:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The two go hand in hand. We want stability in the mid-east to ensure reasonable access to mid-east oil in the future. To get that stability, we need to change the current mid-east dynamics so that terrorism can at least be contained and open markets can emerge. If local based democracy and freedom do not end up being the solution, then the rest of the world will need to come up with an alternative solution.

2007-07-08 13:24:15 · answer #6 · answered by Roy 6 · 3 0

no, the delusion of "Iraqi freedom" theoretically would have stabilized Iraq and therefore stabilized it's oil. In other words: it's for the oil. Without Saddam threatening the west to cut oil output, iraqi oil would have become a more reliable source. However, this plan failed miserably, now iraqi oil is totally unreliable and output is far less than pre-war levels.

2007-07-08 13:20:04 · answer #7 · answered by PD 6 · 2 1

'by all Accounts this isn't even a war...its a routing out of Islamo Fascism'
I don't see much 'routing out' going on, do you?

The reason why Bush is still in Iraq, and wants 'freedom' in Iraq, is because he wants whoever is in charge to honour the 'contracts' to supply oil to his buddies, that's why.
Wake up. Geesh.

2007-07-08 13:24:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Before the war, The Cheney's reported their annual income at around $150,000.

This year, Cheney reports his income at about 8 1/2 million. think he's making money off the blood of our soldiers?

Think Shell, Exxon, and Mobil are foaming at the mouth while making huge profits off the blood of our soldiers?

Bush has increased the threat of terrorism world-wide by his arrogant reckless actions. Every single report states the threat of terrorism has increased under Bush.

the blood of all our soldiers is on Bush's hands...the lies, the deception the snot nosed arrogance.

You young children that still support this man are in the 29% minority that do not have the gray matter to understand the wreckage Bush has brought our nation.

I swear, all you juvenile neo-cons who are still living with mommy & daddy would support Hitler if he had a republican name tag.

WAKE UP!

2007-07-08 13:28:54 · answer #9 · answered by Stan 6 · 3 2

there were plans that were in place before the war.
bush and cheney were going to go after iraq 911 or not.

it was the plan, i kid you not, afganastan was a stepping stone that got us thinking his boot em in the buns, bring em on attitude!!!

and most of us went right along with it. but instead of calling me a leftist do your homework, pay attention, and tell me if im wrong. i wish i was., cause i aint saying democrats are any better, im sure some of them had there hands in this mess to.

he thought that iraq would cave in like afganistan, control of oil is powerful stuff.

2007-07-08 13:37:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers