It is 1942. You have the means and opportunity to illegally destroy a Nazi death camp...?

Question

...without killing or injuring anyone. Would you do it? Or would you refrain, because blowing up buildings and equipment is in itself violent?

Answer 1

who says it's violent? It's mean to destroy someone elses property, but yeah I would do it because it would save people....

Only Jew hating Muslims and Nazi's would say no....

Answer 2

I would do it, as long as no one was injured. blowing up buildings is not violent, people blow up buildings all the time when the want to demolish it to make way for something new.

Answer 3

I would most DEFINITELY still blow it up! Even though the act of blowing up a building IS violent (i agree), it would be ENDING MUCH MORE violence than you are causing. I know you said it would be illegal, but i think the law doesnt always concider circumstance. I'm sure god would forgive you.

Answer 4

I'm not a pacifist; I would blow it up, although if I could wait until some of the nazis were actually in it, I would.

Before you go where I know you're going, I think you should google "the weathermen."

Answer 5

Illegally destroy their camps? I find what they did to be morally reprehensible and illegal in its own right and would not hesitate to be the first one in line to pull the pin from the gernade that would have taken all those bastards out.

Answer 6

Absolutely.

Answer 7

...of course.

I still think that Roosevelt should have blown up Auschwitz when he had the chance, even if all the Jewish prisoners already interned would have died. They would have taken the Nazis and NOT World Jewry with them.

Answer 8

Blow up all buildings and camps.

Answer 9

Forget the buildings, I'd blow it up.

Answer 10

As long as no one got hurt, I'd do it in a heartbeat.