Lets let everybody come have a better life. Why should Mexico be considered the greatest country in need. Mexico is, I am told is so bad,Iraq is a vacation spot compared to Mexico.People who want people to have a better life, let's include the whole world and not just Latin America. Let's bring everyone in..We shut down the border patrol no need to have them,shut down everything.Let us be fair and equal.Let's allow everyone in..Maybe we can get up press 50 on the phone.No need for NAFT anymore come one come all.
2007-07-08
06:06:38
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Zoe
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
Let everyone in, be fair, stop hating other countries.
2007-07-08
06:12:32 ·
update #1
Been there, doing that.
In addition, we'll teach 'em all how to fly jets and allow them to buy guns.
For English, Press1
^
2007-07-08 07:06:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Suze 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Thought I'd land my 2 cents on some of the replies here.
Millie
WE already are paying the taxes. US lawmakers don't give a rat turd how much we pay. They're getting their raises.
Jones_ray1
Dude, I'm an expert college student with limited disposable cash. Mexico is loaded with wall-to-wall weed, easy drunk local chix and cheap drinks.
I ask WHY NOT go to Mexico?
It is my understanding of Zoe's post that prompts me to believe that:
dognhorsemom and suze have grasped the OP's REAL purpose with wit and wisdom.
booman also gets it.
/
2007-07-08 07:26:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
To the extent that you're serious about this idea, I can think of objections to it: If we allow everyone who wants to come here, why don't we take over their countries of origin and make them safer and better places to live. Then, we can move to their countries.
2007-07-08 06:23:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer think of that we could desire to continuously permit each and every physique in... i think of that we could desire to continuously reform our regulations to permit greater human beings are available LEGALLY. most of the individuals who pick again into us of a could lots choose to do it legally, and those people who meet particular standards concerning wellbeing, their ability to paintings, etc could desire to be allowed again in. Doing so will a great deal decrease the style of people who are available illegally, making it greater durable for the individuals we actually do no longer pick again in from 'sneaking by ability of' with something of the individuals who purely intend to make a residing. i think of that we could desire to continuously have a greater powerful fence gadget to maintain border crossers and drug runners out... yet this is barely one piece of the puzzle.
2016-10-01 03:35:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Riiiight, lets let 6 billion people into the United States.
2007-07-08 06:11:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by caballero5792 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
You really think so??? Because we are not just victims here. Americans and Europeans often blame competition from low-wage Third World countries, or the influx of immigrants from those countries. In fact, it is more directly the new round of economic colonialism that is the culprit, as it sets into motion the kinds of changes that cause the immigration and ... have dire effects on the poorest countries themselves - countries whose economics have fallen under the control of foreign corporations (American) and whose resources are raided and shipped north to the wealthiest industrial nations (America and Europe). The new trade rules leave Third World countries with little ability to resist or protect themselves, or seek alternative economic strategies. So, the result, mass immigration to First World countries. Lets not call ourselves victims, because we are somewhat responsible for this problem...
2007-07-08 06:21:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
this can not be for the following reason if we do that and all can come on in then where will the corporations that care nothing about anything but getting cheap labor going to get it then when all are legal
2007-07-08 06:10:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What a great idea. Last one out of Bangladesh, turn off the lights.
2007-07-08 06:25:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by dognhorsemom 7
·
7⤊
0⤋
your premise is fallacious.
it's a question of proximity and having the richest and greatest country in the world next to a poor country where people have trouble surviving!!!!!
2007-07-08 06:10:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by nomames 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
That's what bush is doing today, with US borders not secure.
2007-07-08 06:18:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋