English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They suck anyways , but running ads during the race using a quarter of the screen is really stupid and lame. Thank god next week is their last race this season.

2007-07-07 15:06:36 · 25 answers · asked by Four Horsemen AKA NinersFan 7 in Sports Auto Racing NASCAR

25 answers

THATS why i have Directv hotpass and i watch it when a commerical comes on or if a wreck happens because you can choose to hear audio from your team, from hotpass, or from tnt or whoever covers it... and it has two screens.. one in the car of the driver and the other screen is from whoever is broadcasting it.. i would rather pay, pay per view for it and not have any commericals!!

GO JEFF GORDON!!

2007-07-07 21:20:47 · answer #1 · answered by i♥holio 5 · 1 0

I'd rather have the commercial taking up a quarter of the screen than the whole screen. At least you can keep an eye on the race during the commercial.

2007-07-07 22:12:32 · answer #2 · answered by GirlsRGamers2 7 · 1 1

i don't think it's a stupid question personally. i don't mind the whole having commercials on the screen during the race because atleast you can still see the race! but the whole set-up of it...the stuff that keeps flashing under the running order...it may be interesting to read for some people...but it's totally distracting to those of us who are concentrating on the race!

i just wish they would've kept the old set up the stuff that they put on the screen never bothered me!.....but luckily TNT is almost done hosting NASCAR.

2007-07-07 22:29:53 · answer #3 · answered by VGarr48 2 · 1 1

I think the only thing that would make people happy would be no commercials whatsoever. To get that NASCAR would all end up being pay per view. I actually like this a lot better than any of the other options, so you can't hear the race during the commercials. You can still at least see it.

2007-07-07 22:11:21 · answer #4 · answered by 20forLIFE 2 · 1 1

You don't like the 1\4 screen for the ads. You don't like TNT coverage. You didn't like the few commercial breaks. Maybe YOU should start up a station, win the bid for the NASCAR coverage and do it your way. They say you can't please all of the people all of the time. You are proof.

I liked it better than the past coverage. You can watch pretty much the whole race as it happens. What's not to like???

2007-07-08 00:38:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

better a quarter of the screen than the whole screen, did you notice when they went to full commercials they would be back in 90 seconds

2007-07-08 00:23:45 · answer #6 · answered by cheesehead with an attitude 5 · 0 1

I'm a big NASCAR fan, and I agree with you TNT has always done
a lousey job presenting the races, I wish NASCAR would chose a network that everybody could watch. I don't have cable, so I have to rely on MRN radio.

2007-07-07 22:16:02 · answer #7 · answered by nexteltom17 4 · 1 2

I thought I would like it, but so far, I am just tired of hearing Weber talk. His mini-commercials for that segment's sponsors got old fast. Maybe someone with a more pleasing voice? And we got it the first time that the commercial breaks are for the local cable providers.

2007-07-07 22:14:45 · answer #8 · answered by fordkid14 4 · 1 2

This is a step in the right direction.At leastthere is not a break away commercial every 2 minutes.Other than pay-per-view someone will complain everyweek.

2007-07-07 22:38:30 · answer #9 · answered by blakree 7 · 3 1

I thought is was going to be better, but it got worse. We kept seeing the same dumb tnt commercial and then we had to sit thrrough bad commercials with bad acting on the small screen. It was very annoying and disappointing. If it was another track, I probably wouldn't have watched it.

2007-07-07 23:26:10 · answer #10 · answered by Austin B 3 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers