It's already been proven that evolution is false. Leading evolutionists like Stefan Jay Gold and Ricardo Drawkins have retracted their claims.
But Creationists now need to take their case further, and prove the falsity of other "scientific" theories that conflict with the Bible. I'll start.
First, the theory of gravity. It is just a theory, not a fact. And it conflicts with The Ascension, which is discussed in Revelations. If gravity were true, and large things were attracted to each other, then the Earth would be attracted to the Sun, and we would all burn up, but gravity is false.
Second, the germ theory of disease is just a theory, not a fact. Diseases are caused by demonic possession. When I had a cold last month, I prayed and had my preacher perform an exorcism on me. I got better within a few days. When my Aunt had pneumonia she went to a doctor and died because they did not perform an exorcism.
Any creationists know of any other scientific theories we can attack?
2007-07-07
10:56:50
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
pixie K, I'm not talking about Steven J. Gould or Richard Dawkins. I'm talking about Stefan Jay Gold and Ricardo Drawkins, both of whom were prominent evolutionists but recapitulated when they saw the irrefutable logic behind creationism.
2007-07-07
11:10:43 ·
update #1
I don't know the names of any books that Stefan Jay Gold wrote, but I know he was a supporter of the theory of punctuated creationism, which states that God changed several species at once instead of small changes over time.
Ricardo Drawkins is the author of such works as "The Evolution Delusion" and "The Sighted Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Creationism reveals a universe with Design"
I'll get started on disproving mathematical theory, which is clearly just a theory and not a fact.
2007-07-07
11:56:04 ·
update #2
Someone give this man a cookie. I haven't read anything so humorous all day.
2007-07-07 11:02:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Morkarleth 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I found some theories to attack, but I don't think you are going to be happy. If you find credible evidence to the contrary on a non-religious website, feel free to provide the links. Since you misspelled both Mr. Gould's and Mr. Dawkin's name, I am going to go out on a limb and say you are not well versed in the works of either.
Shortly before his death, Stephen Jay Gould published a long treatise recapitulating his version of modern evolutionary theory, written primarily for the technical audience of evolutionary biologists: The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (2002).
Richard Dawkins is a prominent critic of creationism, describing it as a "preposterous, mind-shrinking falsehood". he has never refuted the theory of evolution.
Here is a link to Newton's Law of Gravity (not Newton's theory of gravity).
http://physics.about.com/od/classicalmechanics/a/gravity.htm
Acute viral nasopharyngitis, often known as the common cold, is a viral infectious disease of the upper respiratory system . Most common colds are caused by infection by rhinovirus. Other viruses causing colds are coronavirus, human parainfluenza viruses, or human respiratory syncytial virus.
Neither Stefan Jay Gold nor Ricardo Drawkins are prominent evolutionists. If you believe they are, then I am sure you can point to a list a books they have written on the subject. They sound like names people have made up so that they could confuse people into believing they are Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Drawkins.
Available at amazon.com
The God Delusion and The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design By Richard Dawkins
Neither Ricardo Drawkins or Stefan Jay Gold comes up in any author search engine. Sorry, but unless you have actually read books by these authors and can list a website of where they are available, I'm going to have to say you were duped.
2007-07-07 11:07:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
just because these people changed their mind(whether they were brainwashed or coerced) doesn't mean that evolution is false. Secondly it is not just large bodies that are attracted to each other for example we are attracted to earth. the earth isn't eaten up by the sun because all the other planets in the solar system are pulling us back from the sun and all the other stars in the galaxy and the universe are either pulling us toward and away from the sun in such a way that we rest comfortablyaway from the sun. Why would you believe Ascension from a book??? Do you believe in magic from harry potter or disapearing cats from alice in wonderland??? Diseases are caused by bacteria and germs. This is a fact!!! You got cured because you had a cold and they usually clear in a couple of days anyway. Your aunt died from pneumonia because this is a serious illness and her body could not fight the viruses with or without the help of the medicine the doctors prescribed.
I have some stuff that disproves creationism.
Human tailbone and appendix. These are vestigal organs, body parts that we don't use but accquired from our ancestors. Early embryo development. Humans look very similair to elephants and dolphins when we are first developing in the womb.
2007-07-07 11:01:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm a christian and I dont mean to be rude but gravity is true I dont believe evolution is true so we agree there but germs and diseases are true look under a microscope they are not demons they are germs! They could not possibly be demons because anyone who has put their faith in God and has accepted Christ as their personal savior cannot get possesed. Germs and other diseases were causes of the curse which God put on the earth when adam sinned.
2007-07-07 11:11:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Holly T 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Which faith? there are various faiths that exist perfect now. And what appropriate to the religions of the classic civilizations? How have been the diverse historical religions of the Greeks, Egyptians, Aztecs, Persians, chinese language, Romans, Indians, etc. to fall via the wayside however the present day religions carry any actuality? somewhat as we learn greater. because of the fact a e book tells you so? No. faith is what human beings utilized in historical situations to describe the unexplainable. Why did the sunlight upward push and then the Moon? the means of sunshine overcame the means of darkness and the sunshine became overpowered via the means of darkness, daily. Why is there lots water and what makes the waves crash? Poseidon, Ruler of the sea. human beings might pray to Poseidon for risk-free passage around the sea, because of the fact they FEARED what might take place in the event that they did no longer. right this moment's faith are no longer diverse different than that human beings nonetheless have faith it in the face of a plethora of recent expertise.
2016-10-20 05:14:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's a lot of gravity to that question. We should note that GOD is creator of all things, that is an article of Faith. That being said, those things which are Scientific are, and we can show so empirically. Those who have Faith know that is the way GOD made it. And we can find meaning in the way GOD made things, as they pertain to GOD. You can for instance learn about an inventor by his inventions, or an author by his books, or an artist by his music or paintings. So too you can learn about GOD by observing the world around us. Science amounts to observation and theory in the Scientific method for explaining that which we perceive. With the stipulation that all scientific theories be explanable by experiment which is repeatable by any indepentant researcher anywhere in the universe under the same conditions of experiment. That's a bit abstract but if you want to prove that light travels at a particular speed you would need to setup an experment to measure that speed and it must be shown that light travels at a certain speed under given conditions as it happens light travels at the same speed under all conditions regardless of the speed or position of the observer which is provable by experiment. However there are miracles that happen in the world, of healing, and of signs and wonders . .. these are not repeatable . .. however science has tried and failed to explain some miracles like the Stigmata of Saint Padre Pio. The reason science can't explain miracles is because they are the direct intervention of GOD. Where as science works because GOD made it that way, miracles are irreproducable phenomenon because GOD has acted or intervened directly. Though GOD controls all around us, guiding evolution and the weather and all things in ways that if we believe we would see everyda GOD is with us, sees what we do, and is everywhere controlling all things. Why then you say bad things happen. there is mystery in that, but i can assure you if you do what GOD wants good things will come your way. But maybe not in this world, because the promised land is in HEAVEN. But if you do keep GOD's covenant we have the promise of LIFE in JESUS CHRIST.
-LOVE your neighbor as yourself.
Amen.
2007-07-07 11:09:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by jesusfreakstreet 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The theory of adding numbers is false as well. It is a well known fact that one plus one is more than two sometimes.
2007-07-07 11:04:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by gjmb1960 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You are full of crap. Typical lies by religious fanatics that can not handle the truth.. Science puts so many holes in your ridiculous garbage is just plain hysterical anyone is really that stupid to believe any of it.
2007-07-07 11:05:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Scientists may not agree with religion but science does.
2007-07-07 11:00:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by hpathik 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
you need to read a wonderful book I found to help answer your answer and question:
"the faith of a scientist" by Eyering
2007-07-07 11:09:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by duhanlorian 3
·
0⤊
1⤋