Congratulations! You have made it to the end of this activity.
You took 1 direct hit and you have bitten 2 bullets. The average player of this activity to date takes 1.39 hits and bites 1.11 bullets. 383429 people have so far undertaken this activity.
Click the link below for further analysis of your performance and to see if you've won an award
(i CLICKED AND IT SAID)
Battleground Analysis
Congratulations!
You have been awarded the TPM medal of distinction! This is our second highest award for outstanding service on the intellectual battleground.
The fact that you progressed through this activity being hit only once and biting very few bullets suggests that your beliefs about God are well thought out and almost entirely internally consistent.
The direct hit you suffered occurred because one set of your answers implied a logical contradiction. The bitten bullets occurred because you responded in ways that required that you held views that most people would have found strange, incredible or unpalatable. At the bottom of this page, we have reproduced the analyses of your direct hit and bitten bullets.
Because you only suffered one direct hit and bit very few bullets, you qualify for our second highest award. A good achievement!
Click here if you want to review the criteria by which hits and bullets are determined.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How did you do compared to other people?
383429 people have completed this activity to date.
You suffered 1 direct hit and bit 2 bullets.
This compares with the average player of this activity to date who takes 1.39 hits and bites 1.11 bullets.
45.72% of the people who have completed this activity, like you, took very little damage and were awarded the TPM Medal of Distinction.
7.67% of the people who have completed this activity emerged unscathed with the TPM Medal of Honour.
2007-07-07 10:20:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Peanutbutter Goddess ~ PM! 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
0 and 0
2007-07-07 17:25:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Plausibility Quotient = 1.0
The metaphysical engineers have determined that your conception of God has a plausibility quotient (PQ) of 1.0. A PQ of 1.0 means that as far as the metaphysical engineers can determine your conception of God is internally consistent and consistent with the universe that we live in. A PQ of 0.0 means that it is neither internally consistent nor consistent with our universe. More than likely, your PQ score will be somewhere between these two figures. But remember that this is your PQ score as determined by the metaphysical engineers. The editors of TPM have no control over their deliberations, so don't blame us!
What kind of God is that!?
The metaphysical engineers are happy to report that, to the best of their knowledge, the God you conceive is internally consistent and could exist in our universe. But they are less sure that what you have described deserves the name of God. She is not, for example, all-powerful. A God which knows everything or is totally benign may be a wonderful ideal, but is she really a God unless she has ultimate power?
We suspect that your God is not the traditional God of the Christian, Jewish or Muslim faiths.
I'm agnostic... the only thing I selected was
"Perfectly Free"
as the other options don't meld with my concept of what any possible supreme being would be accurately described as.
:D
2007-07-07 17:17:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
That was pretty fun! I got one direct hit and bit 3 bullets...lol not too shabby.
PS I got the same hit as Darrol P above and I agree with what he said about it.
2007-07-07 17:31:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kelly + Eternal Universal Energy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I did 1 bitten bullet and 0 direct hits...
You have been awarded the TPM medal of distinction! This is our second highest award for outstanding service on the intellectual battleground
2007-07-07 17:31:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Prophet Of Truth 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I agree this is interesting. I scored one direct hit. Here is their explanation:
"Earlier you said that it is not justifiable to base one's beliefs about the external world on a firm, inner conviction, paying no regard to the external evidence, or lack of it, for the truth or falsity of this conviction, but now you say it's justifiable to believe in God on just these grounds. That's a flagrant contradiction!"
However, this is a flagrant contradiction only if you believe God is part of the external world. One does not have to justify what is in one's internal world as long as it does not impede others rights or impede a community project in which one has a stake.
2007-07-07 17:31:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Darrol P 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i took zero direct hits and i bit 1 bullet
2007-07-07 17:19:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by funaholic 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
no direct hits and 2 bullets bitten
2007-07-07 17:23:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by atheist 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 bullet bitten
2007-07-07 17:20:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, it said I got the third highest medal, whatever that means. Maybe it is 1/3 ?? It was interesting, but I would like to argue their logic.
2007-07-07 17:30:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by RB 7
·
0⤊
0⤋