English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What i feel is that.... "Live Earth 2007" is the wrost thing they did. lol. Why?

They are still using up alot of power to host the thing. Making the people to dive or fly there to see their fav stars and etc.

But the songs are pretty good for the Live earth.

Post your ideas on what kind of event if there is a "Live Earth" again in the furture.

I was thinking at frist that the media have to send to send stars/bands to really to go and clean up the place. And the same time for them to tell the world why must we do it. Not using shows like "Live-Earth" to waste so many power and have people to drive and etc and etc and so on.

2007-07-07 03:21:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment Global Warming

"Though falsely reported to be performing, Arctic Monkeys refused to play at the Wembley Stadium Live Earth show. Drummer Matt Helders says, "It's a bit patronizing for us 21-year-olds to try to start to change the world, especially when we're using enough power for 10 houses just for stage lighting. It would be a bit hypocritical"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Earth#Controversy_and_criticism

2007-07-07 03:22:47 · update #1

Hello user - raise money? But where will this money go to? Like the Tsunami in 2004, where did the money really went to?

2007-07-07 03:33:46 · update #2

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/59269912/

2007-07-07 03:43:34 · update #3

7 answers

Everything being used for live earth is environmentally conscience. And it irritates me that people call environmentalisits "fools." At least we care about are planet. If we dont do something within approx the next ten years we can kiss our earth goodbye. And those are the facts. So for ppl who think global warming is a myth keep thinking that way and one day you'll know that its true.

I think live earth is a good idea, its helping to get it out there and make more ppl aware.

2007-07-07 04:36:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You make a good point. They are using a lot of energy to host the concert and all. But I think hosting concerts will not really help but raise money. What they need to do is to find a way to convince people who dont believe global warming is real that it is. If we do this the government can take some serious action about this issue...

2007-07-07 03:28:30 · answer #2 · answered by hello 3 · 0 1

I don't believe we know enough about global warming & cooling trends to make a dooms day call on it. How old is the world? we have tracked warming & cooling trends for what 100 years if that? we were told in the 70's that we were headed for another ice age now we are headed for global warming 30 years later! nope, I don't buy it. but I do believe that all the bands that fly privet jets to "Live Earth" are hipocrits!

2007-07-07 04:13:29 · answer #3 · answered by Razr 3 · 0 0

actually i think that as much asi like tv evey tv should unite and have the same program at the same time and have that program to talk about global warming and i think that is a way to let alot of people know about global warming cause if we dont let people know all our generations of the future are gonna regret that we didnt do anything

2007-07-07 04:24:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If they were really serious, this entire thing would be performed in studios and sent out on the internet, so nobody would have to burn extra fossil fuel to get there and "become aware".

2007-07-07 03:43:55 · answer #5 · answered by The Father of All Neocons 4 · 0 0

Big Concerts today. Lots of people get high and expell new gas

2007-07-07 03:29:09 · answer #6 · answered by Michael M 7 · 3 0

everyone's pretty much already been brainwashed or are at least aware of the asinine, blame america global warming propaganda by now. & way too many idiots believe in it

2007-07-07 03:28:07 · answer #7 · answered by cretinboi 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers