I always thought she was...is she?
2007-07-06 20:40:46 · 12 answers · asked by DaNi 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes she is. Being divorced doesn't man you are no longer mormon. We believe in divorce, and nothing is held against you if you feel divorce is needed.
Not every mormon family is really big! My in laws had 4 kids, my parents had 5, and we have 3. I don't think that's big. We aren't the only ones who have big families! Look at the Dougers! They have 17, last I heard.
2007-07-09 04:28:58 · answer #1 · answered by odd duck 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Very much so. The whole Osmond family, or the majority, are LDS. Osmond Studios (which I don't think exists any longer) was in Utah.
2007-07-06 20:46:09 · answer #2 · answered by Jonny aus den USA 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She's no longer compromising, she is work out her God-given loose company. How and whilst to placed on the garment is a private factor. that's to remind the wearer of the covenants he or she has made with Jehovah, and that's as much as the wearer to decide whether or to no longer placed on it in a undeniable condition. as an occasion, i could placed on the garment whilst i bypass to the well being center, for the reason that I workout in a short-sleeved t-blouse and long strolling bottoms, yet i am going with to no longer. it truly is as much as me. they're MY covenants and that's MY dating with God. i do no longer could seek for suggestion from with a rulebook every time I decide what to placed on. the final education my Bishop instructed me is which you do no longer placed on it for the S's - activities, showering, swimming and something else I overlook... Marie Osmond has for sure desperate that if her job demands her to placed on a undeniable outfit which makes it complicated to placed on the garment, then she would be able to go away it off. Many others have comparable jobs - lifeguards on the sea coast, as an occasion. Marie's very own brother, Donny, appeared as Joseph in the West end and became required via his job to placed on a loincloth. i'm particular that, like Marie, he weighed up the placement and desperate whether it became okay to take the job and go away off the garment for a jiffy. i'm particular that, like Marie, he felt that he could gain this without compromising his covenants or his dating with Heavenly Father and the Saviour.
2016-10-20 03:52:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She can't seem to keep a husband long enough. She must be one of those 'celebrity' mormons who can work on sunday, go thru spouses like Kleenex, and still keep their temple recommend.
But she remains the poster child for mormon womanhood.
2007-07-07 04:09:35 · answer #4 · answered by Dances with Poultry 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, yes! Now that she's divorced, I wonder if she and her husband had their marital union "sealed for time and eternity" in a Mormon Temple!
Hey, "Cheese & Rice": A lot of Roman Catholics have many children, too, and they don't believe in birth control or abortion! I also know a few Evangelical Christians who believe in "be fruitful and multiply" and don't believe in birth control or abortion!
2007-07-06 20:51:07 · answer #5 · answered by trebor namyl hcaeb 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, been divorced three times, if I am not mistaken, adobted a couple of kids, but one or tow of them had naughty pictures on their "myspace: sites and so she was not happy with the choices they made. had to watch as her Mom battle cancer as well.
2007-07-08 03:25:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-07-06 20:42:59 · answer #7 · answered by Pamela 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she has 8 kids, which definitely qualifies as Mormon. Also, my parents think she is super cool, which pretty much tells it all.
2007-07-06 20:43:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I believe she still is. She used to be.
2007-07-06 20:47:46 · answer #9 · answered by debra k 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As far as I know, she still is.
2007-07-06 23:32:50 · answer #10 · answered by mormon_4_jesus 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋