if sex is only intended for procreation does that mean men who are sterile and women who are barren should not have sex?
2007-07-06 19:29:02 · 7 answers · asked by just curious (A.A.A.A.) 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The logic of your statement is valid, but the argument is not sound.
Sex has many other functions. Intimacy, exercise, companionship, recreation, and of course that ever so popular "happy ending".
Blessed be!
2007-07-06 19:45:36 · answer #1 · answered by Luinrandir 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How could they have known that they are barren if they didn't have sex in the first place!!!! Of course, they cannot just run for medical check up whether they are barren or not before trying to create a bambino!!!!!
2007-07-07 02:43:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you insult with a blindfold on, have you forgotten that in the Bible it says that sex is a gift from God to married couples, i mean if you want to debate something please research it you make yourself seem ignorant, to animals it is intended to procreate, the first answer is also wrong as long as sex is with a married couple it is not a sin, i'm supposed to believe in evolution, along with these people who do not have the smarts to even read and research
2007-07-09 03:54:32 · answer #3 · answered by AFI07 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who said sex was only for procreation? Whoever it was, they should be tarred, feathered, and castrated (to help clean the "stupid" out of the human gene pool).
2007-07-07 02:46:00 · answer #4 · answered by Don P 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Evidently so.
That leaves me out, I had a hysterectomy.
That's ok, a little "sin" can be fun.
We won't even go into the birth control pill now will we.
2007-07-07 02:42:03 · answer #5 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
sex is great.everyone should partake of it
2007-07-07 03:06:05 · answer #6 · answered by Night Nurse 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
so many rules, so little time!
2007-07-09 16:18:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋