My wife is from Japan (samurai family lineage). She tells me that seiza is actually "bad" for the knees. Due to the contraints of certain Japanese societal situations when the samurai were more relevant seiza allowed for the ability to sit for long periods (hours), and still move well from the seiza position. The other benefit is the transferrence of reliance upon the skeleto-muscular system for power to the hara and seika tanden. This allows for improved harmony & power with the overall body and it's surrounding environment. However, the physiological effect on the knee structure itself results in a geometric perversion, and the shape of the knee becomes unsightly. Also, due to this change the knee actually becomes weaker in standing waza from a newtonian physics point of view even though the whole body becomes more effective due to hara reliance. This occurs if done from childhood with serious rigor. Please provide any technically correct and deep arguements/answers to this.
2007-07-06
18:31:42
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Murakumo Dojo
3
in
Sports
➔ Martial Arts