I realize my body will become compost but is it possible the energy within me moves on.
Whether or not it has a consciousness is to far down the road to even consider as of yet. But just the transference of energy would cause some interesting reactions in society.
2007-07-06 17:12:14 · 12 answers · asked by Sean 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Science cannot even cure HIV, so i dont think so.
2007-07-06 17:16:04 · answer #1 · answered by Near of DN 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, if there is some specific energy loss at the time of death, then that should be something that would be testable.
I don't think any such thing has ever been witnessed before.
2007-07-06 17:16:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe in the afterlife, but I'm just thinking, maybe a soul gives off energy waves.
2007-07-06 17:15:58 · answer #3 · answered by WTP 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I in no way have. "a million. there must be a beginning as much as each and everything." i wish your unlikely to contradict your self in the subsequent breath and say god began each and everything. "2. something can not come from no longer something." What created god? "God can not be proved or disproved via way of technological awareness, so hence no possible deny the opportunity of his existence." no possible say for a hundred incontrovertible fact that god does not exist. yet you do no longer go with evidence to no longer have faith. How lots evidence do you have leprechauns do no longer exist? Do you deny the existence of leprechauns? "nicely what's the reality of actuality?" it is one meaningless fact. "technological awareness can not coach we are no longer in basic terms some pc application controlled via creatures from the "actual international" (like the matrix)." Why no longer? "each and everything is in keeping with faith" Is gravity in keeping with faith? you particularly could get a grip.
2016-10-20 03:30:32 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your consciousness is your spirit. It's the real you and lives on after your body dies. As far as science proving a soul, they just need to know what they're looking for as opposed to mineral, vegetable and so on. I think they're on that already.
2007-07-06 17:18:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Y'know that compost thing? That's where the energy goes.
2007-07-06 17:16:30 · answer #6 · answered by YY4Me 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, there is no soul so science cannot prove what is not. God made humans as psycho-somatic wholes. Material+immaterial=human (no division or multiplication in that formula).
2007-07-06 17:22:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you can be fairly sure that conciousness, whatever it is, is not energy. energy has no *structure*. very simple stuff. all you can say about energy is how much of it there is associated with an object.
2007-07-06 17:27:47 · answer #8 · answered by vorenhutz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the existance of a soul would be proven if the memory of one person could be fully actualized from the body of another (i.e. kill Bob Smith's body; Bob's Smith's memories and personality are found in another body).
2007-07-06 17:16:20 · answer #9 · answered by ES 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Nor the impossibility, either. From which it follows that belief in any such thing is useless.
2007-07-06 17:38:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in our present form it was never intended for us to know the answer to this question.no god would mean no soul and vice versa.
2007-07-06 17:20:07 · answer #11 · answered by Stretch 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋