did you hear the one about the amateur radio operator explaining his accident to the insurance company?

Question

Dear Sir,

I am writing in response to your request for additional information for block number 3 of the accident reporting form. I put "poor planning" as the cause of my accident. You said in your letter that I should explain more fully and I trust the following detail will be sufficient.

I am an amateur radio operator and on the day of the accident, I was
working alone on the top section of my new 80 foot tower. When I had
completed my work, I discovered that I had, over the course of several
trips up the tower, brought up about 300 pounds of tools and spare hardware. Rather than carry the now un-needed tools and material down by hand, I decided to lower the items down in a small barrel by using a
pulley, which fortunately was attached to the gin pole at the top of the tower.

Securing the rope at ground level, I went to the top of the tower and
loaded the tools and material into the barrel. Then I went back to the
ground and untied the rope, holding it tightly to insure a slow decent of the 300 pounds of tools. You will note in block number 11 of the
accident reporting form, that I weigh only 155 pounds.

Due to my surprise of being jerked off the ground so suddenly, I lost
my presence of mind and forgot to let go of the rope. Needless to say, I proceeded at a rather rapid rate of speed up the side of the tower.
In the vicinity of the 40 foot level, I met the barrel coming down. This explains my fractured skull and broken collarbone.

Slowed only slightly, I continued my rapid ascent, not stopping until
the fingers of my right hand were two knuckles deep into the pulley.
Fortunately, by this time, I had regained my presence of mind and was
able to hold onto the rope in spite of my pain.

At approximately the same time, however, the barrel of tools hit the
ground and the bottom fell out of the barrel. Devoid of the weight of
the tools, the barrel now weighed approximately 20 pounds. I refer you
again to my weight in block number 11. As you might imagine, I began a
rapid descent down the side of the tower.

In the vicinity of the 40 foot level, I met the barrel coming up.
This accounts for the two fractured ankles and the lacerations of my legs and lower body. The encounter with the barrel slowed me enough to lessen my injuries when I fell onto the pile of tools and fortunately, only three vertebrae were cracked.

I am sorry to report, however, that as I lay there on the tools, in
pain unable to stand and watching the empty barrel 80 feet above me... I again lost my presence of mind. I let go of the rope.

Answer 1

Kinda like this one:

ANTENNA ROMANCE ... From The Internet

Two antennas met on a roof, fell in love and got married.
The ceremony wasn't much, but the reception was excellent.
Since they were a perfect match, soon they generated harmonics.
Wrapped the harmonics in dipoles.
But later the harmonics turned out to be parasitic elements.

The true story -- she was a tri-bander and he felt trapped, so they went on separate beam headings

Answer 2

Regardless of the "Illegal" parking of the van, you pulled out into road and into the path of a vehicle using this road, causing the collision. At worst, the van can only receive a parking ticket, and whilst the van did obscure your view, pulling out into a road which has moving traffic is wrong. Did you take the registration of the van and Car A and forward it to the Insurance company, to prove their existence? Whether the prawn that collided with you was speeding or not, is not up for debate as other independent witness's would have to confirm this in a statement, which you don't have. It is so unfair, I know, but if you understand the ONLY evidence the insurance company has, is Driver B on the main road, approaching a junction, when a vehicle emerged causing a collision. I would write back and make a strong point of car A causing Car B to swerve and collide with your car, which you were taking every precaution, slowly and cautiously emerging in an attempt to view the road from behind an obstruction. Strongly emphasise that you BOTH saw car B travelling at what you BOTH believe was excessive for the conditions, area and topography of the road, (alignment of the carriageway). Emphasise that whilst Car A caused Car B to swerve, it was unavoidable that a collision would have occurred no matter where you were at the junction. Whilst this may not help your case much, at least the claim for the driver of Car B will probably be contested and if the accident is further investigated, at worst, you will be held to blame, at best, both of you may be held partly responsible. Either way, your insurance will pay up, and your next renewal will increase by about £400 +/-

Answer 3

Funny

Answer 4

LOL i so totally know someone who this could be about ... lmao ... i could be the person having to write to the insurance company ...

GOOD 1 B.
xoxoxoxoxx
emily
♥ya B.

Answer 5

Ouch!

Answer 6

Long but funny! Good one! lol! 10!

Answer 7

Yeah, I heard this one. It's hilarious.

Answer 8

Not intersting at all

Answer 9

THIS IS LONG I GOT TIRED OF READING IT SO IT SUX

Answer 10

ouch!!!! talk about ignorant!~star