Do they have a dictionary in the halls of Congress? How come no one understands the definition of illegal?

Answer 1

They understand fully the definition....
The problem is not their understanding of the law, the problem is with enforcement.

You can have as many laws as you want, but if they are not enforced, then what is the point ?

Fact is, we went so long without enforcing the immigration laws that have existed in this country for 50 years....that we do not have the resources for "retro-enforcement". Not to mention, that we've allowed so many immigrants to integrate into the local economies....many facets of local economies, labor, construction, farming..have become reliant on illegal workers. Yanking them out of their jobs and deporting them now, is a death sentence for many small businesses who rely on them (exploit them) for cheap labor. We got a nice little quagmire here with the immigration issue...which is why congress is impotent in regards to producing any kind of viable solution.

This is one of the only issues I actually support Bush on, because I think the only way out of this is to set a deadline for full blown enforcement of the current laws, and provide some sort of path to legal citizenship. If this doesn't happen soon the problem only gets worse.

Answer 2

I am sure they have access to dictionaries. It seems Congress is being influenced by lobbyists and campaign contributors. Those of us who want to do the right thing, stopping illegal invasions, are not big money contributors.

Answer 3

Secularism in accordance to the dictionary is: 'the concept that faith and non secular bodies would desire to haven't any area in political or civic affairs or in working public institutions, exceptionally colleges'. if so the communal occasion (now in opposition as constantly and could ever be) and it is allies can't be reported to be secular in any respect. each and every thing they are asserting or do is professional-Hindu and anti-different religions. they're attempting to incorporate faith into politics, social existence, training, progression, and what no longer. it is the coverage of the government of India to uplift the oppressed human beings. As of now, different than for decrease caste Hindus and south Indians, Muslims and Christians or maybe Sikhs are oppressed via the north Indian gang. So the government will do each and every thing possible for the upliftment. particular, the less than privileged have the 1st impressive to the rustic's components and the PM is a hundred% splendid. the sadness of biting dirt is known. Mosques, chruches and gurudwaras are minority places of worship. Minorities would desire to be secure and supported as their contribution to the rustic's growth is comparitively plenty extra. they do no longer seem to be basically ingesting away the rustic's wealth and organiziing riots. Sadhvi has been detained in terms of the Malegaon blasts prepared via Hindu terrorists. If convicted she would desire to get carry of the utmost possible punishment. we don't prefer chinese language and Pakistani spies interior India. Indians haven't any love for Ajmal Kasab and the regulation will take its course. one ingredient is for confident, he won't be escorted like a VIP alongside with the exterior Affairs Minister to Kandahar. diverse rules for various communities because of the fact each and every community does no longer persist with the comparable social practices. The shape of India became into drafted via intellectuals. The lesser beings are no longer mature sufficient to question it. If dictionary can't be discovered contained available, there is something actually incorrect. verify that out. via the way: If Nehru-Indira-Rajeev-Sonia-Rahul qualifies as a dynasty in Indian politics, what disqualifies, Nehru-Indira-Sanjay-Maneka-Varun from being a dynasty?

Answer 4

They are the ones who make the laws to say what is legal and what is not. Just as fashions change in clothing, fashions on what is legal and what is illegal also change. If you look into it, for a time income tax was found to be unconstitutional and therefore illegal.

Answer 5

Well, let's see: it's illegal for politicians to take bribes, it's illegal for police to let meth labs operate if they know they are there, it's illegal to bilk your employees and steal their pensions for your golden parachute, it's illegal to wire tap without a warrent, it's illegal for the post office to open your mail, it's illegal to dump toxic waste, it's illegal in many places to yak on the cellphone while driving, it's illegal for politicians to use their offices to get jobs and perks for their relatives, believe it or not, it's illegal to lead countries into war for false reasons...

So yeah, there's a whole lot of illegal sh*t going on. We all notice that.

But considering where you have posted this to, I don't imagine you care much about all those things... and the illegal aliens are what's burning you up.

Well, it's actually illegal to hire people if they aren't citizens. I suggest you go arrest the business people who make all this happen.

Good luck with arresting a businessman in America. For them, nothing is illegal.

Answer 6

I appreciate the question! i wonder about that also. Seems like the norm around me is people committing crimes, harming people and lying.. get paid off with good perks.. people who stand on truth and principal are sprayed with toxic chemicals, financially impaired intentionally, and denied housing, jobs, good medical care, proper benefits and are harrassed incessantly because we stand up to corruption alone.. what ever happened to the truth being honorable?
YOU SUCK AMERICA!

Answer 7

Ok, see, I'm sure you're trying to make a comment about immigration or something, but you could be referring to so many differant things here.

You can't honestly expect rational discussion without explaining what you're complaining about.

And honestly, it's just silly, even in sarcasm, so suggest that anyway, of course they do.

thing is, there's always more to these debates, if you could include what bills/debates/etc you are referring to, someone could at least explain why the other side feels that way, even if they're wrong, it seems like you don't even know what they're trying to say.

Answer 8

Obviously not. They understand the word, they would just like to change the meaning...

Answer 9

"illegal" is a relative term in congress, just like "law" and "justice".

Answer 10

Yes they have one but it's in the wrong language.