English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Adam and Eve?
Monkeys?

Explain...

2007-07-05 19:35:21 · 23 answers · asked by jazzymint 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

23 answers

Here's How... For The Past 440+ Million Years...
( MRCA = Most Recent Common Ancestor. )
Note 2 Monkey MRCAs ( < < ) and 1 With Chimps ( <<<<< ).
The planet took some 500,000 years to accrete from star stuff and rubble, completing some 4,550,000,000 years ago, and life took hold within the first billion years. Here’s a basic reverse timeline of life-related events (see Source):
- Y-Chromosome “Adam” (patrilineal MRCA) – 59,000 ya
- Mitochondrial “Eve” (matrilineal MRCA) – 143,000 ya
- H. sapiens sapiens (Modern Human) – 130,000 ya
- H. sapiens (Archaic: H. heidelbergensis) – 800,000 ya
- Early Genus H*m*: H. habilis, et al. – 2.5 mya
- Australopithicines (many species) – 4.5 mya
- Hominids & Chimps/bonobos (MRCA) – 5.5 mya <<<<<<<
- Above & Gorillas (MRCA) – 7.0 mya
- Above & OrangUtans (MRCA) – 14 mya
- Above & Gibbons (MRCA) – 18 mya
- Above & Old World Monkeys (MRCA) – 25 mya < <
- Above & New World Monkeys (MRCA) – 40 mya < <
- Above & Bushbabies, Lemurs (MRCA) – 63 mya
- Above & Colugos, Tree Shrews (MRCA) – 70 mya
- Above & Rodents and Rabbitkind (MRCA) – 75 mya
- Above & bears, weasels, cats, +… (MRCA) – 85 mya
- Above & rest of Placental Mammals (MRCA) – 105 mya
- Above & Mammal-like Reptiles (MRCA) – 130 mya
- Above & Reptiles (Incl. birds) (MRCA) – 310 mya
- Above & Amphibians (MRCA) – 340 mya
- Above & Lungfish (MRCA) – 417 mya
- Above & Ray-finned Fish (MRCA) – 440 mya
(The book below gets increasingly technical as other MRCAs join other life-forms, including, in order: worms, insects, barnacles, Chengjiang & Burgess Shale creatures (including early vertebrates at ~520 mya), jellyfish, coral, sponges, fungi, amoebozoans, plants, archaea, eubacteria, ribosomes, and somewhere around 3.9 bya, the Origin of Life by abiogenesis.) ... [ * Feel Free To Email, For More. * ]

2007-07-05 19:38:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Good question.

I strongly believe that my ancestor are Adam and Eve instead of monkeys.

An evolution theory which stated that the 'Big Bang' create a single cell and evolved into a living thing is not really base on science although they claim it is the most scientific theory.

Big Bang will create extreme heat and release toxic gasses and materials. It is naturally impossible to create a single living cell in such extreme condition.

Should the process really create a living thing which will evolved into complexes creature in such condition, we will surely have creatures which will tolerate to extreme heat and toxic gasses. According to the natural selection theory, a living thing must evolve to suit to the surrounding in order to survive.

Should our ancestor really emerge from such extreme condition we will surely tolerate extreme heat and toxic gasses.

2007-07-05 22:39:46 · answer #2 · answered by z_jepoh 4 · 0 0

i does not carry my breathe. human beings are risky creatures! Even the sweetest can turn undesirable given the excellent suited situations. yet no person must be an animal the two. there's a line between straight forward anger and irrational violence. human beings ought to study the place it somewhat is and while to no longer lose their temper or be over tender. no longer user-friendly as a results of fact the media glorifies violence or maybe cartoons prepare that obtaining revenge is far "greater helpful" then attempting to comprehend and forgive. this is going to be an uphill warfare all the way.

2016-10-01 00:16:12 · answer #3 · answered by shakita 4 · 0 0

Genesis talks about the first human (Adam).

The theory of evolution clear states that we are not from monkeys, but a "missing link".

Frankly, it doesn't matter how we ended up a "Human beings", but that we are.

2007-07-05 19:44:50 · answer #4 · answered by J. 7 · 1 0

I believe that God used evolution to create life. Adam and Eve were the first "true Man" and "true Women", because they were the first humans with SOULS, therefore they and humans after them are specially created in God's image. We are descendands of Adam and Eve. God bless.

2007-07-05 19:39:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Well a man and a woman plants a seed from the man into an egg in the the womans belly. Then the seed grows inside the belly until nine months later the egg is hatched. And out pops a baby human. Isn't that amazing?
kisses Betty B.

2007-07-05 19:42:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Actually *we* created this limited, restricted, type of existence percieved around us. It gives us an illusion of separation and a false sense of power. Some might even call it a *fallen* state of existence.

Since the original ones cut themselves off from the true source, a secondary type of energy is required, also known as *astral* energy. So this human form with all its emotions, provides a rich source of energy and food for those who are determined to maintain the ostensible separation from the true source of existence.

Evolution was a series of steps, and *tweaking* to achieve the best sources of energy or *batteries*, for this, the *matrix* of splendid dreams...

2007-07-05 19:56:40 · answer #7 · answered by Architect 2 · 3 0

Adam and Eve.

But now God doesn't create us in the same way. We are born instead. When a couple are in love they may bring spirtis into this World and they receive their body then.

2007-07-05 19:55:33 · answer #8 · answered by fishcan'tseewater 3 · 1 0

You might as well ask, "Why is it now?"

At this moment in time, only humans can ask this question on the Internet. Some day there won't be humans. For this brief moment in time humans exist. We are a product of evolution, but nothing "ends up", except for extinction.

2007-07-05 19:53:51 · answer #9 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1 0

WE evolved from a tiny omeba,to what we are to day,we were never created by some surpreme being as other's would have you believe!! if they say you do, then they no know what they are talking about,and if you think that is double dutch i will again call you a liar as i am an englishman and majored in ENGLISH.

2007-07-05 19:44:16 · answer #10 · answered by the-Devil-is-King 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers