why does the creation museum claim it's true?
(mind you, they call it "diversifying")
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=537836005&context=set-72157600335006271&size=l
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=538154666&context=set-72157600335006271&size=l
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=538273179&context=set-72157600335006271&size=l
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=538111716&context=set-72157600335006271&size=l
i especially like the last one and how they not only admit that apes evolved but even point out that the fossil lucy evolved from said apes.
but not man of course. oh no, that would be horrible.
2007-07-05 14:12:05 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They require evolution in order to explain how Noah got all those animals on the ark. One "canine" type evolved into wolves, dogs, and foxes. One "equine" type evolved into horses, donkeys and zebras.
Without evolution, there just isn't enough room on the ark to make it believable. Even if all the dinosaurs are babies. LOL!
2007-07-05 14:17:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Looked at all the pictures. Don't see evolution. Evolution is a lie; unless you see evolution when a calico cat has a solid color kitten.
Let's be redundant. Piltdown Man; Neanderthal; Cro-magnum man; Lucy is a Chimpanze.
There are NO TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS in the record. EVERY "MISSING LINK" EVER DISCOVERED HAS LATER BEEN SHOWN A HOAX. Where is your fossil evidence of any species changing to another?
I don't mean bacteria in a petri dish in a laboratory. I mean vertibrates changing bone structure???
WHERE?
2007-07-06 11:22:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theory - coherent group of general assumptions, body of principles belonging to a certain subject; speculation, hypothesis
evolution - development, progression, unfolding, growth; gradual change in the gene pool
If the Theory of Evolution is true where are the living links between species Animals? Where are the fossil Links between animals? There should be Millions of them.
FYI Lucy was a chimpanzee- point in fact have you ever seen the chimp called George. She matches him in every way and he at the Smithsonian.
Evolution if not a fact!! You can not prove that it is! If you could you would be a Millionaire. Stop trying to force your lye's down my throat.
2007-07-05 14:26:33 · answer #3 · answered by Dark Angel 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
actually, they believe that evolution can change characteristics of creatures at a far faster pace than evolutionists (should i say mainstream scientists?) do, since they must believe that all life (on land, at least) is descended from a few hundred breeding pairs representing the 'kinds' that survived on noah's ark. even humans who have rather low genetic diversity, could not have acquired it in a mere 4000 years (other than by magic i guess).
2007-07-05 14:23:00 · answer #4 · answered by vorenhutz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Good question. I'm still in shock that they even admit to evolution (even if by a different name)...Maybe they're just backpedaling a little, trying to fit religious beliefs with science a bit more.
2007-07-05 14:19:46 · answer #5 · answered by Dawn 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
And that's the types of answers you get when you base your "theories" on assumptions.
2007-07-05 14:18:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well look at where they put the darned thing! That explains alot!!!
2007-07-05 14:27:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When you mix the truth with a lie you can make the lie much stronger.
They're freakin' ignorant, but they're not stupid.
2007-07-05 14:16:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Evolution? you mean the theory with millions of holes in its fossil record?
2007-07-05 14:18:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 7⤋
wow. that is bizarre.
2007-07-05 14:17:29 · answer #10 · answered by Ray Patterson - The dude abides 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋