A very feasible possibility. All the naysayers you're getting are probably the knee-knocking fearful sheeple that hide behind their scriptures. But I think we are on the verge of several major A.I. breakthroughs. And if, in a hundred or several thousand years, our machines do surpass us in intelligence and acheivements, it will be right in line with my personal god hypothesis that "god" is a "they." That if we are not a wholly naturally occuring phenomenon on this planet, than we are a product (or a by-product) of some other, more advanced (and likely long gone) life form. And in the case of your question, we will have become ourselves, some approximation of god.
2007-07-05 09:06:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by scottychop 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you really believe in God you should never ask such questions to his subjects knowing fully well that answer to such questions can be given only and only by God alone. Had any living soul known answers, it would have already been recorded and made known to the whole world, Instead what we got is **** and bull stories and theories given by branded religions, which do not make any sense to an ordinary human mind.So questions when and how creation came into being and when and how humans came into being can be said to be known only to the true one, the God himself..And if your are scientific minded, then for your answer, study the theory of evolution by natural selection, there is unlimited evidence left over million of years, which shows without any doubt as to how species evolved on this planet earth over geographical times. If you credit creation of humans to God, he need not have created the amoeba first with millions of other species which have no connection or relevance to humans, thus in evolution, you will find that there is no designed intelligence in the creation, even though intelligence par excellence is the result of natural selection.Even then if you like, you can always attribute this evolutionary process to same power called God.
2016-05-19 00:27:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, it would support it.
This would mean that the intelligent designer would not have to be "perfect" to exist (or have existed). Nor would the designer need to be more complex. The ability for the designer to be less complex than the creation opens far more plausible options in support of the intelligent design theory. It also removes the requirement that the designer must be of perpetual existence. Nor would the designer necessarily have understanding or even continued input into their creation.
Your "student surpasses teacher" model fits the model of intelligent design better than the current one does.
However, I don't agree with any model of intelligent design that has been presented yet. But that wasn't your question.
2007-07-05 08:51:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by freebird 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
your question is totally wrong... there is no such thing as artificial intelligence... i am computer programmer i know what i am talking about... it is just a fancy name for a complex ordered program or software...
i mean if human build it... they can out run it... simple
2007-07-05 08:49:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Go watch the Transformer movie... all your questions shall be answered!!!
2007-07-05 08:48:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Highlander 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dunno but i loved the movie A.I.
irobot was ok too. haha that one answers ur question tho.... the computers were unable to understand the ability of humans to love and care and sacrifice for the greater good
2007-07-05 08:57:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by tarmee2006 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would never happen!
2007-07-05 08:48:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by God is love. 6
·
0⤊
1⤋