um...Spain, Russia, Indonesia, and the Sudan would greatly disagree with you.
2007-07-05 03:01:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Depends on what you call safe, there have been attacks all over the world, Phillipines, Australia, Germany, France, Spain, Kenya, Somalia,Ethiopia, ect....They just want to attack the USA and Great Brittain more than the others.
2007-07-05 03:02:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by booman17 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
If one knows his/her history, then one understands the concept of "imprinted" colonialism. Colonial seats and their expansionist satellites cannot seem to stop themselves from infringing upon the human rights of other, less aggressive civilizations. The citizens of colonial countries generally, and blindly, support systems of poor, moral character in which lying, stealing, predjudice, devastation of the earth and murder are disguised as virtues that lead to a superior state of civilized behavior.
Much of the world, victimized by such doublespeaking behavior, has had enough. These worlds react in the only way that they are able since most have not expended their energies into the development of "weapons of mass destruction" such as those of colonial seats and their now "independent" colonies. Many cultures of humans of this earth, with all the possibilities existing within human nature, consciously choose not to rear their children with the images of gluttonous colonies as a desirable way of life, and, yet, the corporate "Feed me, Seymour" divisions of free trade insist upon forcing everyone into their nets.
I have a tee shirt imprinted with an 1880's photo of the Apache resistance leader, Geronimo, some of his family and warriors, that reads, "Fighting terrorism since 1492." There, you have it.
2007-07-05 04:08:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Barney B 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
UH. So the attacks in Yemen, Algeria, Malaysia, Chechnya, Russia, Germany, Spain, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia are just figments of my imagination right?
2007-07-05 03:03:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Other countries are not safe, remember the harmless cartoon depiction of Muhammad in the Netherlands causing a great deal of violence of terrorist threat? That is the irrational nature of the beast we're fighting against.
The United States (son) and UK (Momma) have the broadest freedom in the world, although the UK is less free (You can get your house taken away for being disrespectful, link cited.)
I digress. The fundamentalist perversion of Islam has skewed the religion stating their ultimate goal is world domination (link cited.) The greatest threat to this movement is the United States with it's overt freedom and super power status.
Because of political correctness and corruption within the U.N., the United States is the one of a few nations willing to take a stand against oppression.
This age of terrorism is just like WWII, Hitler wanted world domination and a dictatorship, similar to Islamic fundamentalists. In WWII 400,000 United States soldiers died fighting against that threat to liberty, and we must fight against that same threat today. The Nazi propaganda machine taught the Islamic fundamentalists on how to manipulate oppressed people (link cited) and the hate was left brewing after WWII.
Read Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Winston Churchill, FDR, Ronald Reagan, Edmund Burke commanding you to fight against any threat to liberty!
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil........is for good men to do nothing."
- Edmund Burke
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace."
- George Washington
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life."
- Winston Churchill
"Whensoever hostile aggressions...require a resort to war, we must meet our duty and convince the world that we are just friends and brave enemies."
-Thomas Jefferson
"Above all, we must realize that no arsenal or no weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have. It is a weapon that we as Americans do have. Let that be understood by those who practice terrorism and prey upon their neighbors."
- Ronald Reagan
"Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory and our interests are in grave danger. With confidence in our armed forces, with the unbounding determination of our people, we will gain the inevitable triumph, so help us God."
- FDR
"We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I can say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us: to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: It is victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival."
- Winston Churchill
2007-07-05 04:22:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Peter J 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
When the guard dogs are gone, the sheep are free to be killed or controlled.
Kicking anthills? Oh, brother ... Let the ants take over your kichen, climb up your legs, bite your children and contaminate your food. That's the answer!
2007-07-05 05:31:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by SKip 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
If wolves were smarter and could use technology don't you think they would target the guard dogs and not the sheep. Once the dogs are gone then the sheep are free.
I mean the sheep are free to be eaten.
2007-07-05 05:22:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
because usa and britain feel that they r strong and always try to boss by telling others to do this,do that. Usa and britain sent troops to iraq, angering a lot of people there therefore these peole to get revenge attack usa and great britain. usa and great britain dont even want to back out their troops.
2007-07-05 03:08:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hitesh Dhanwani 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
They aren't safe, its just that when we are attacked nobody much else takes notice. Apparently terrorism can only be done against white people.
2007-07-05 03:06:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Runa 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Jealosy is a major contributing factor as you can see here by some of our non-white friends on this post.
Americans and Brits have money, nice houses, nice cars, great jobs......basically the World economy is held intact by the US. I don't blame other countries for being jealous, but it would be nice if more appreciation was given to the US since we help out other countries in need (and get repaid by terrorist attacks)
2007-07-05 03:17:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Joey Chestnut - Hot Dog Champ 1
·
0⤊
5⤋
I guess if you dont consider Yeman, Isreal, Palastine, India, Pakastan then your statement is true.
2007-07-05 03:08:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋