1) Before the internet, I spoke with a Latin American revolutionary--who sacrificed most of his life to promoting what he thought was social justice in his country. He said, "You know, I've lived in the U.S. for 10 years, and my conclusion is that people here would not sacrifice their lives if they thought their country had reneged on its original values." I thought for a moment, and into my head popped a response, "I can tell you why," (it was just a gut feeling). Americans are raised to think we are 'special.' If you are 'special' you will let the next person sacrifice his life". He looked at me, and a lightbulb went off in his head. "Exactly!" he said, as though I had understood something profound. It wasn't. It was just a thought. Which leads me to item 2) With the internet, there is a safe way to complain--operate a so-called 'activist' blog? What a great way to seem daring and be perfectly safe. But if the stakes were higher, like in China? Who would be brave then?
2007-07-04
22:39:49
·
7 answers
·
asked by
holacarinados
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Civic Participation
Someone who responds with such a thoughtless remark by sarcastically using the term 'Mr. Thoughtful' seems to me someone who is rather thoughtless. And what in my question suggested that I was not in the military? I suggest you study what is meant by 'critical thinking.'
2007-07-04
22:54:19 ·
update #1
I would not categorize your remark as thoughtless since I am not sure what your definition of the word 'liberal' is or whether you were indirectly labeling me with that appellation. Again, a presumptive remark with little thought behind it. I was not questioning the military. I was questioning the motivation of bloggers.
2007-07-04
22:56:47 ·
update #2