2007-07-04 21:42:06 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
good point farren
2007-07-04 21:46:30 · update #1
stupid fukken yanks you can pardon or excuse anyone
you obese bunch of child murders fuk i wish i had wmd
2007-07-06 21:16:01 · answer #1 · answered by cool cat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, you cant pardon someone who hasnt been convicted of anything. Second, Scooter did not receive a pardon, he had his sentence reduced. Third, why would we want to pardon and/or release P.O.W.'s, when we havent even won the war yet? Fourth, "Bush" is spelled with a capital "B". Fifth, as a sidebar, I honestly wonder why Bush hasnt simply passed an executive order effectively "disbanding" the democrat party, and charging them with racketeering under the Rico Act, for attempting to sabotage our efforts to win this war by offering aid and comfort to the enemy. The main reason I have no faith left in Democracy or the Republic is because of people like you. The sooner we can re-organize the United states into an official Imperial system of government the better off we will all be, and soothsayers like you will have faded into a dim memory of a bygone era.
2007-07-04 23:08:38 · answer #2 · answered by Chains 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
First, the prisoners have not been charged or convicted. You cannot be pardoned if you have not been convicted.
Second, Scooter was not given a pardon...his sentence was commuted.
Third, do you really see an accurate parallel between Scooter and the prisoners in Gitmo?
2007-07-04 21:46:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You are obviously a democratic liberal and don"t pay attention to the FACTS! Bush did not pardon Libby, he only commuted his sentence.Quite unlike the wholesale pardons the Bill Clinton gave in his final days.
2007-07-04 23:29:23 · answer #4 · answered by postaledde 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can he pardon them? He hasn't charged them with anything in 5 years!
2007-07-04 21:49:44 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no "POW's" at Gitmo! Learn the difference between POW's and EPW's before you spout your Lib rants.
2007-07-05 02:21:31 · answer #6 · answered by jonn449 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya, we should pardon them....send them back to Afghanistan....and this time kill them or turn them over to some warlord who will give them some hometown justice, instead of taking them prisoner.....
Honestly, what else do you do with them?
2007-07-04 21:46:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't pardon people who haven't been charged of anything.
2007-07-04 21:45:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
no actually he shouldve pardoned clinton for crimes that he committed in office but not yet convicted of. it would ensure hillary the nomination and thereby rudy the win.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-07-04 22:59:21 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To be pardoned, you must be charged.
GITMO residents haven't been officially charged.
2007-07-04 21:45:33 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋