Just wondering?
2007-07-04 14:09:51 · 16 answers · asked by Doc Watson 7 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Painting
Well, maybe I'm not that old.
2007-07-04 14:13:10 · update #1
Well, maybe not that poor either. I throw in the 'poor' part as an easy way to filter out the little gold diggers and the 'trophy wife wannabes.'
2007-07-04 15:12:15 · update #2
Links, with sub-galleries:
http://pics.livejournal.com/unmired/gallery/00002xgc
As an experiment I actually ran an ad similar to this in Yahoo Personals several years ago. It ran for a month and I got three replies. Then I ran the same ad, changing the word ‘poor’ for the words ‘very successful’ and got almost two thousand hits the first week. I only bothered to reply to the first three from the first ad.
2007-07-04 15:25:14 · update #3
Dziner, I use the name I use because that is my name. You would understand if you read my short profile.
2007-07-11 05:31:33 · update #4
This Old, (Not that old, 45),
Ugly, Not really, just not as beautiful as I was at 35,but secure with myself.
Poor, Not that poor.Self employed.
Artistically inclined, Speaks 4 languages Fluently,Avid reader,
brilliant as well, a little eclectic, lol, loves life and enjoys people and observing them.
Studies to date; The Formations and beginnings of Civilization,International Business Degree, BA Art with two Specializations,one is the Renaissance and the other is Medieval.
Passions: Ancient History,Civilizations, Languages, Sea or any body of water, Thunderstorms, Interior Design and
Criminology ( but I don't write to inmates)!
Might be interested.
Friends are nice too!
2007-07-08 23:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by Soundproof 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Young women tend to only want to be w/ the "popular" guys to boost their own self esteem. Women 29-31 have gotten over themselves and found out that the "popular" guys are really not that attractive inside and are more trouble than they are worth. And no Jeffery - That is not lowering their standards, it's raising them. Just keep dating the ladies that are a bit older than you. In a couple of years, the females that are our age will start seeing that you are a good catch. That is, IF you want to be with them after all of this.
2016-05-18 03:08:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm. I'd say yes but your art style does not appeal to me. Sorry, that's the real selling point. But I can think of a few artists who fit that criteria I wouldn't mind dating...
...But it is too late. Found a really brilliant writer.
2007-07-04 19:18:37 · answer #3 · answered by violinagin 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not old, but ugly yes, and poor only if he is still a gentleman in providing for the woman within the budget means.
I've dated poor, the ones I encountered turned out to be gigolos unfortunately.
2007-07-04 14:15:18 · answer #4 · answered by parev 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Sorry, Wats - I married my biggest fan on May 20 this year.
You know, I bet if you tried, you could think up three evocative adjectives to describe yourself (instead of derogatory ones) and perhaps get some sincere responses. Hint: Cynical should not be one of your choices...
;-)
2007-07-04 17:16:41 · answer #5 · answered by joyfulpaints 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, how brilliant of an artist are you??? Show us some links...
Edit: I like your style. If I was single, maybe.
2007-07-04 14:35:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
tidy ur self up and if ur a brilliant artist then get some money and u should focus on old ,ugly ,poor women.
2007-07-04 14:14:47 · answer #7 · answered by iloveyou 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hey buddy...women wrote JEFFREY DAHLMER and SCOTT PETERSON in prison looking to hook up with them. You are a SHOO IN! Hope springs eternal!!!
2007-07-04 16:51:38 · answer #8 · answered by ckswife 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Don't forget humble too!
2007-07-04 14:12:17 · answer #9 · answered by Belzetot 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Old maybe, but would prefer handsome and rich.
2007-07-04 14:13:12 · answer #10 · answered by Dianne 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋