English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

You would get saved and I would find out just how wrong the scientific community is..

2007-07-04 10:28:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I would have done a lot better in biology if I had showed up for class instead of just reading the text book within the first couple weeks of the year starting, and then only showing up for tests.

So basically, been there, done that. But I don't think that reading the Bible would do all atheists any good. Some yes, but then some have already read it from "In the beginning" to "Amen."

Are you implying that Christians have never read a science book? And what would your definition of a "real" biology book be? Could you give me a list? I'm not trying to be rude, I'm genuinely interested.

2007-07-04 17:23:06 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1 0

It would not change anything as it is dependent on how much the reader would believe or have faith in the author. As a human being who has a personal relationship with God, I can not have faith in the conclusions drawn by men of science. I am not saying that science is totally wrong....I can not answer that question, but I do know that my God exists and is pretty much what the Bible says he is.

I could make this statement about religious leaders as well however. Religions were not started by God or even encouraged by God or Jesus. No where in the Bible does it say that men are to make their own interpretations and set up their own rules of how worship of God is to be done etc. These are things of man.

2007-07-04 17:25:07 · answer #3 · answered by Poohcat1 7 · 0 0

I would have wasted my time and would most likely have a whole lot to laugh about. You would also be wasting your time because the Bible is beyound your understanding . Only by God's grace do his followers understand the Bible. Read second Timothy chapter two verses 23 thru 26. And for all you belivers Titus chapter three verse nine. And remember it's crazy to argue with a fool.

2007-07-04 17:38:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

So, um, your assumption is that the biology book I used in Biology 101 in college several years back was somehow not real? Why is it you people can never ask a question without some attendant assumption embedded within it?

2007-07-04 17:27:07 · answer #5 · answered by RIFF 5 · 1 0

The end result would be Creationists would be more knowledgable about science... as any atheist would be... but it wouldnt detract from their faith. Do you know how many creationists fully understand science? Do you know how many scientists have faith? Do you know how many fallacies exist in evolution theory?

Another end result would be that you might actually know what youre bashing. You might actually be able to formulate an intellegent argument if you read the Bible

Do you fully understand the difference between atheism, agnosticism, and anti-theism? Youre an anti-theist... as bigotted and close-minded as anyone can be

2007-07-04 17:23:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

probably nothing
i've already read a lot of biology books and then read stuff like "The Science of God" and other books that made more sense
I suggest you don't read the Bible because it will confuse you if you don't have the Holy Spirit.

2007-07-04 17:21:55 · answer #7 · answered by tatereatinmic 3 · 2 0

Creationists do not deny the existence of Science, they just don't feel that Biology and Science can rule out the existence of a God.

2007-07-04 17:21:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

The end result would be based on your belief. If you do not believe that the Bible is the Word of God, then you'll believe in the Word of Man.

2007-07-04 17:21:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Besides the fact that there are many creationists with PhDs in Biology (some are friends of mine), there are many Christians who believe in evolution though they reject its materialist assumptions, so what's your point exactly?

2007-07-04 17:44:16 · answer #10 · answered by historybuff33 3 · 2 0

The end result would not produce any changes in either one of us. We already know what we believe, and we wouldn't change our minds just because we read something we already disagreed with.

2007-07-04 17:21:56 · answer #11 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers