I would say that the militants are in the FLDS church, and the liberals are the former RLDS, now known as the Community of Christ.
2007-07-04 11:58:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by mormon_4_jesus 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm not active in the LDS Church as starting in high school I sort of became a bad boy type doing things that the Church doesn't approve of (like drinking and having sex) and now I smoke too so I would need to change ... that said, I've never heard of the RLDS ... the FLDS seem pretty good, but I don't like their problems with the law. I do think it would be cool to join the Apostolic United Brethren (they're about the same size as the FLDS and have their own communities throughout the American West and western Canada). I like to try new things, so yes absolutely.
2007-07-04 12:59:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the true church. The principles taught today are the same principles taught by Joseph Smith. Gordon B. Hinckley is not "pollitically correct." Many people would laugh at the idea that the conservative LDS church is in any way led by militant Liberals. They are neither militant nor Liberals in the normal sense of the word.
So, the answer is, no way, Jose.
2007-07-06 13:04:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Doctor 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is RLDS ReorganizedCoJCoLDS(Community of Christ)?
Is FLDS Fundamentalist LDS?
What about "Temple Lot"LDS?
Who are the "militant Liberals"? Thank you
I am not LDS at all and I do not find the arguments of any of them at all,Brighamite or not, to be such as to tempt me away form Historic Trinitarian Christianity,especilly from my Catholic Christian and Apostolic fullness of the Faith,IMHO.
2007-07-04 12:59:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by James O 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
strange believers.
hinckley i dont believe he is last prophet alive .
2007-07-04 12:54:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
or LSD?
2007-07-04 12:55:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Grendel's Father 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
LSD
2007-07-04 12:54:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Don W 6
·
0⤊
1⤋