What can I say? Human beings are idiots, and will destroy the Earth through innumeracy.
Global warming is a slow process. The rate of increase is about 0.03 C/year, and is, therefore, much less than the natural variation in global average annual temperature. Even though global warming is a real process, it is statistically quite likely that even the global average annual temperature could decline for 5 years in a row.
Nevertheless, the inexorable 3 C increase in the coming century will be a disaster, leading to mass extinctions and quite possibly the death of most human beings.
2007-07-04 05:10:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by cosmo 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Despite the view of the 'global warming' alarmists..
There has been climate related proof that will shut up the global warming crowd for good in 10-15 years.
There is more conclusive proof that there will be worldwide cooling of 10 degrees by the #1 expert on climatology.
(Btw, there really is only two on the whole planet who are experts on climate and neither support most of the 'global warming' b.s.
2007-07-05 06:34:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by pcreamer2000 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I've noticed that people complain about global warming on hot days and wish for it on cold days. But of course the entire planet doesn't warm up evenly all at once. In fact, one effect of a warmer planet will be more extremes in the weather, including more rain some places, more snow in others, even while deserts are growing and the seas are rising. Hopefully we can stay focused on the problem despite temporary variations in the weather.
2007-07-04 04:30:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you want to acquire supply cash for local weather study, do you feel that you'll be able to get a cheque in the event you say," I want the supply, as I feel that I can end up that the figures that the present paradigm is situated upon are mistaken" ? The exceptional environmentalist, David Bellamy, has been silenced, and refused airtime. There continues to be no confirmed causative hyperlink among the volume of Co2 within the surroundings, and an develop in worldwide temperatures. The WWWF snap shots of the polar bears swimming had been taken within the Arctic summer season; whilst the ice cap partly melts, as they could not stand up to picture within the wintry weather. The ice was once too thick! The East-Anglian uni study figures. "Oh! The figures do not fit our expectancies. Oh good. Keep quiet. Because we all know that we're proper." When the perception, and the religion is extra predominant than squarely going through the reputable doubts of plenty of non supply-supported scientists, technology has been superceded through devout zealots. As Oliver Cromwell colourfully stated." I pray thee, within the bowels of Christ, do not forget that thou mayest be mistaken."
2016-09-05 14:30:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're seeing a lot of backpedaling going on, frantic excuses, and total dismissing of anything that doesn't fit their preconceived notions of what the data should be.
The truth that you can not use localized weather to gauge global climate is never more evident when that weather doesn't support their argument.
Now, we have folks claiming that the GLOBAL (average) temperature increase will lead to random local weather extremes. Totally unfounded and utterly ridiculous.
2007-07-04 16:32:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by 3DM 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Global warming is just a scam . Don't by into it as the CO2 problem has been taken care of by the plants.
2007-07-04 05:37:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by JOHNNIE B 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
plants remove co2 that nature gives off, but human activity gives off 5-10% as much as nature each year, which plants do not take back, leading to a buildup of co2 and a disruption of the equilibrium concentration in the atmosphere that has lasted for millions of years.
2007-07-04 05:42:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by PD 6
·
0⤊
2⤋