A bridge between science and religion discovered and ignored?

Question

A bridge between science and religion discovered ?

For many, many years it was discovered that there exists a negative side to truth; an unknown paradox that truth can lie.

This negative component to truth was being wrongly employed by many social agencies, with the paradoxical result that the traditional family unit was being divided, and the sexes polarized.

This negative side to truth, anti-truths, also could be the bridge between science and religion, as it confirms that the 'original sin' is still with us, and can be understood by understanding the scientific properties between light and truth.

The new dimension to truth, anti-truths, also redefines half-truth, and lie.

Problem is the same media people who were informed of this continue to attack religion and have failed to expose this negative side to truth.

So why is the mainstream media in Canada, and in the USA ignoring this ?

http://thejesuschristcode.com

Answer 1

Balderdash and gobbledygook. No bridge is needed between science and religion, because there's no real gulf between the two.

Answer 2

"So why is the mainstream media in Canada, and in the USA ignoring this ?"

Probably because it's a bunch of clap-trap, that's why. Here's a better explanation of the relationship between religion and science.

Dr. Francis S. Collins is Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. He currently leads the Human Genome Project, directed at mapping and sequencing all of human DNA, and determining aspects of its function. His previous research has identified the genes responsible for cystic fibrosis, neurofibromatosis, Huntington's disease and Hutchison-Gilford progeria syndrome. He is a member of the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences. For the rest of his credentials, click on the link here: http://www.genome.gov/10000980. Collins spoke with Bob Abernethy of PBS, posted online at http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/transcripts/collins.html, in which he summaries the compatability of fact and faith thusly:

"I think there's a common assumption that you cannot both be a rigorous, show-me-the-data scientist and a person who believes in a personal God. I would like to say that from my perspective that assumption is incorrect; that, in fact, these two areas are entirely compatible and not only can exist within the same person, but can exist in a very synthetic way, and not in a compartmentalized way. I have no reason to see a discordance between what I know as a scientist who spends all day studying the genome of humans and what I believe as somebody who pays a lot of attention to what the Bible has taught me about God and about Jesus Christ. Those are entirely compatible views.

"Science is the way -- a powerful way, indeed -- to study the natural world. Science is not particularly effective -- in fact, it's rather ineffective -- in making commentary about the supernatural world. Both worlds, for me, are quite real and quite important. They are investigated in different ways. They coexist. They illuminate each other. And it is a great joy to be in a position of being able to bring both of those points of view to bear in any given day of the week. The notion that you have to sort of choose one or the other is a terrible myth that has been put forward, and which many people have bought into without really having a chance to examine the evidence. I came to my faith not, actually, in a circumstance where it was drummed into me as a child, which people tend to assume of any scientist who still has a personal faith in God; but actually by a series of compelling, logical arguments, many of them put forward by C. S. Lewis, that got me to the precipice of saying, 'Faith is actually plausible.' You still have to make that step. You will still have to decide for yourself whether to believe. But you can get very close to that by intellect alone."

Answer 3

That's great! It proves that Christianity ISN"T the truth!

Answer 4

looking at your source, i can see this is a bunch of un-backed babble without even having to read it.

Answer 5

So what kind are ya...cashew, pecan, walnut, peanut, almond, pistachio, other...?

Answer 6

you lost me at hello