No. The 2nd author must have a lot of spare time on his/her hands.
2007-07-03 06:59:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
He makes some good points. He is, of course, arguing philosophically while Dawkins argues scientifically so it doesn't read like a discussion.
2007-07-03 13:59:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eleventy 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
So, can we get a decent, non-biased report on it, or what?? Id love to read the work that disproves the world's leading evolutionary biologist.....
Skalite5...thats what I thought....
2007-07-03 13:58:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Here's a debate between them, if anyone is interested. It's quite a civil debate.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6474278760369344626
Correction, this is with the guy who wrote "Dawkins' God"
2007-07-03 14:05:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dawkins writes a killer reply about it in the London Times:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/debate/letters/article1368831.ece
2007-07-03 14:05:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bad Liberal 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
My goodness! What an original, creative title!
2007-07-03 14:01:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Murazor 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yea. It's absolutely terrible. I read it too, I'm sorry you put yourself through that (I know I hated myself a little afterwards).
2007-07-03 13:57:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
How goofy.
So, the person couldn't attack the views so he went for ad hominem?
2007-07-03 13:58:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by LabGrrl 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Never heard of it. Must be selling like hotcakes.
2007-07-03 13:58:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Nope haven't heard anything about it.
_()_
2007-07-03 13:57:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
1⤊
1⤋