Is it possible for evolutionists and creationists both to be right? See this site?

Question

www.shajaracode.com

Answer 1

It's possible.

But so far, the evolutionists are the only ones who present their evidence for peer review.

Answer 2

No. Simply because creationists will never leave their ideas behind and evolutionists would jump on every new idea hoping there is something new to investigate.
Creationists have made themselves dependant from a vision they can not dillute any more or their will be nothing left.
Evolutionists use the theory of evolution as the best model so far. If something better comes up, they will erect a monument for Darwin and go for newer and better hunting grounds.

Answer 3

You're confusing two issues.

It is possible to believe in God and accept evolution. Most Christians, for example, do - it's only a vocal minority, mainly in the US, that deny the vast amounts of evidence for evolution. Most of the mainstream churches see no contradiction.

However, "creationists" explicitly deny evolution, so it's not possible for them to be right. As Dawkins says, just because two positions are defended with intensity doesn't mean the truth is somewhere in between - it's possible for one side to be simply wrong.

Answer 4

What's more likely is they are both wrong.

Genesis has 2 accounts of creation. Chapter 2 represents the state of scientific knowledge of about 500 BC. Chapter 1 (6 days and a day off) is an attempt to update it based on scientific knowledge from about 100 BC.

We should add a chapter 0 based on the current state of scholarship. In the beginning there was nothing and it exploded. Life just happened (or was deposited by a meteorite). The species evolved by natural selection. etc.

Just think how they'll laugh about us in a few hundred years' time.

Answer 5

No it isn't. I know if I click that site it is going to either be bad amateur philosophy or poorly understood science. Both are trademarks of the creationist movement.
Creationists reject the fact that we share a common ancestor with other primates. Case closed.

Answer 6

Anything is possible, who's to say that God is not using some type of "evolution". But so far there is no evidence of it. See my "360" site and it shows how science leans toward Creationism rather than evolution.

Answer 7

Cool site.Full of interesting ideas like "DARWIN EMBRACED ISLAM"And this cool statement.."Outspoken Atheists like Richard Dawkins created new form of dogmatic religion, headed by a man who is unable to ascertain whether there is life on Mars or there isn’t,"
It all goes to prove people will lie to spread "the truth"
So,"unable to determine if there is life on mars or isn't"is an insult?How pathetically naive.That is called HONESTY,something religious folk know nothing of

Answer 8

creationists are concerned with the beginning (creation) of the universe and the earth
evolutionists are concerned with the beginning and development of life

therefore old-earth creationists (OEC's) and Intelligent Design believers (ID'ers) don't have a great deal of argument with evolutionists.

Young earth creationists (YEC's) believe that the earth was created 6,000 years ago... there is no way that their beliefs can co-exist with evolution theory...... they are just plain nucking futs

Answer 9

Evolution doesn't explain the beginning of life, whereas creationism does. However, evolution is a theory, whereas creationism is an idea from a book based on no evidence whatsoever. Evolution does exist; it has been observed and has a vast amount of evidence. It are the mechanisms of evolution that are still in debate in the scientific community. So the probability of them both being right (the probability of creationism being right) is little more than 0.

Answer 10

no one is a 2000yrs old fairy tale and one is based on science fact look at the creation fairy land in kentucky it makes the usa look like fools