some people use a balckish paint to do drawings on differrent parts of thier bodies it lasts for about 4-5 moths and it;s not epensive at all...
would you do it if not why and if you would on which part of your body and what drawing
and guys what would you think is hot for a girl
like a betterfly above the butt or what...........
thanks all
2007-07-02 23:02:35 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Skin & Body ➔ Tattoos
Well I wouldn't get a fake one.....I guess because I have real ones....
Fake tats are obvious, you are not fooling anyone.
Not to mention I'm 25, I stopped wearing fake tats in middle school.
Spell check, it's your friend.
2007-07-03 01:27:42 · answer #1 · answered by ○•○•Cassie•○•○ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think fake tattoos are fine for children and people who are squeamish or just want something fun for a short period of time. It's all personal preference but I think most people who really want a tattoo will get a real one. If you're getting one for "coolness" or "looks" then you're not doing it for the right reasons in the first place.
2007-07-03 12:01:48 · answer #2 · answered by tetlitea 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean henna tattoos?
No I have real tattoos when you think getting a new fake tattoo every 4-5 months it averages out to the same price ...
I have a tribal/butterfly one on my lower back and a teeny tiny tinkerbell on my neck ... I'm going for a 3rd one soon...
2007-07-03 06:11:54 · answer #3 · answered by Rhyannonn C 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I suppose its better than getting a really bad permanent tattoo. It's like an accessory of sorts that you can get rid of (after a few months) or switch. In that way, it's kind of neat. It allows for variety and more daring choices that you wouldn't make if the end result was permanent. Sounds like a decent idea.
If I was going to get one, it would be on my hip or inner wrist. I dunno what it would be though. I haven't given the whole tattoo thing much though. too permanent. I keep thinking about how it cheapens the classiest outfit. Even 4-5 months would be too long for me.
2007-07-03 06:25:55 · answer #4 · answered by LA 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think they are stupid. people who do it are just trying to be cool to say they have a tattoo. go out and get a real one if thats what your tryign to do. I'm not saying I think I'm cool because I have tattoos because I dont think that way at all, but people who try and make it look like they have one are just trying to be cool. they should grow up.
2007-07-03 11:27:40 · answer #5 · answered by Jenn ♥Cadence Jade's mum♥ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think its good for someone how wants to take a test drive. Better to try it out and realize you dont like it then go and get it and then regret it forever.
2007-07-03 14:50:41 · answer #6 · answered by ssuscello22 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have real tattoos so I personally would not do one. But if you are unsure of a permanent one then I guess that's fine.
2007-07-03 12:44:30 · answer #7 · answered by Bridget 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lower class looking. But at least better than the real thing.
I work with a young man who is now trying to make his way professionally, but he has visible tattoos. It might be unfair, as life is, but he will never get ahead with this defacement. I am sure he wishes he had done temporary instead of permanent.
2007-07-03 08:32:00 · answer #8 · answered by CarlisleGirl 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
butterfly tats r too common, try something else.
i always say that if i were to have a tattoo I'll do it near my pubic bone or on my ankle, something small..
yeah a temp 1 will be good as i dont think i will go for a real one..
2007-07-03 06:12:30 · answer #9 · answered by **squiduz** 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are both good and bad, it's good that it will go away if you don't like it unlike permenate tattoo's. But if you do like it it's going to go away in a few months. But I think they are pretty good.
2007-07-04 15:59:40 · answer #10 · answered by Harnig 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋