Does Physics rule out the possibility of God?

Question

Or do you think that the existance of God is a possibility? Did Steven Hawking totally rule out the possibility that God exists? Again: I am not trying to be judgemental here. I mean no harm, I'm just asking.

Well, I know some Christians are afraid of this subject. But I'm not! As for my opinion: I think Physics actually does more to prove creation rather than not prove. Thats MY OPINION!

LOOK! I am a believer in God okay? lol.... All I am doing is seeing the other points of view! Its not a "sin" for me to discuss what others may believe and why they believe what they do.

Yeah James just like alot of kids I spent 12 years learning evolution. But you know it is really up to us as to whether we believe it or not. I believe some things evolve but not humans! We did not come from monkeys!

Answer 1

On the contrary it proves the point beyond intelligent contestation.

Answer 2

Physics does not rule out the possibility of God because it is simply the wrong tool to detect God.

The Christian God was very careful to prove Himself when He had the Bible written. He wanted to make sure you would recognize him as a God when he acted. What he did is predict the future. No person on earth, no medium or psychic, can claim the one hundred percent prediction rate of God. God gave names, dates, and places so we can check out history and verify his work. He even gave us the very words someone would say centuries before the fact!

By taking this route, God would not have to appear and prove himself over and over again to new groups of people.

Now if you wanted everyone to know that you, as God, were going to come as a human being, you would explain what you were like so you would be recognized. You would put in the city of your birth, where you grew up, what kinds of deeds you would do, your temperament, your purpose, even how you would die.

God did all that in the Old Testament. It was all in written form four hundred years before Jesus came. The New Testament gospels follow Jesus and point out some of the places where He fulfilled the prophecies.

Let me give you an amazing example of prophecy.

“Daniel 11, written in the 6th century B.C., gives an amazingly thorough account of Alexander’s Grecian kingdom, divided first into four competing factions after his death. It predicts details of the struggle between the Ptolemy and Seleucid empires for a period of 160 years, right down to the advent of the Roman Empire. That is why the skeptics used to claim that the book of Daniel could not have been written before 164 B.C., but now we have proof of a much earlier writing text.

“The prophet Isaiah (44:28) gave the name of a king not yet born and of a kingdom not yet instituted and of an event that would not take place for another 150 years. He predicted that a king named Cyrus would commission the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem. Cyrus did come to the throne in Persia, and in the first year of his reign in 538, he issued a decree that the temple in Jerusalem should be rebuilt. (See 2 Chronicles 36:22-Ezra 1:1-3. This prophecy described in the Bible is confirmed by the discovery of a Babylonian inscription.)

“Daniel actually gave the time when Christ would come into the world and die. Daniel (9:24) predicted that Messiah would be cut off (die) 483 Hebrew years after the issuing of the Persian decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem. Artaxerxes Longimanus issued that decree on March 5, 444 B.C. (Neh. 2:1-8), granting the Jews permission to rebuild Jerusalem’s city walls. This, too, is confirmed by archeological discoveries. Four hundred eighty-three prophetic years (360 days to a year) and seven days later, Jesus was crucified as predicted. How could a prophet accurately predict the date of Messiah’s death hundreds of years before it took place, unless he was the ‘voice’ of God as he claimed?”

Thanks to the Dead Sea Scrolls found at Qumran, we know with certainty the above prophecies date before the occurrence of actual prophesied events regarding Jesus.

He has proven His existence perfectly and wonderfully. The Christian God is the true God.

Answer 3

Physics prove that God exists. Every law of physics tells us that all things must have a first cause. God was the cause of all first causes. What caused God? Nothing. That's what makes God God. What do you think is that answer to questions like "Where did everything come from?".

Try these short videos for scientific evidence from another point of view. I suppose you spent 12 years in public schools learning evolution. Were you ever shown an opposing point of view from a scientific perspective? Probably not.

http://www.halos.com/videos/streaming-video.htm#cou

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1760096128712631511&q=chuck+missler

http://www.bigmouthsforchrist.com/Kent_Hovind/index_Kent_Hovind_Debates.html

http://www.nwcreation.net/videos/index.html

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=kent+hovind

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/index.html

http://evolution-facts.org/EncyclopediaTOC.htm

http://www.answersingenesis.org/

http://www.icr.org/

http://creationwiki.org/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge

Answer 4

No, modern physics does not rule out the possibility of the existance of God.

Modern physics produces probability factors through the use of non-linear equations. Anything is possible and , in some cases, that which has the lowest probablity factor turns out to be the reality of the situation.

God might exist, he is just so damn hard to quantify!

Answer 5

Yes. Parallax being key. The distances of stars rules out the creation myth no matter how long they pretend it took. A supernova is a supernova and since it happened (had to happen) after the "creation" it is illogical that we can observe its light if it left its star only 6000 years ago. Especially if that supernova was 6 Billion light years away.

Or I could say, "goddidit."


EDIT

WOW! YOu are the quintessential Xian Fundy on here. You don't "believe" in evolution. If I say, "I don't believe that 2+2=4 does that make it so?"

Answer 6

Physics has no comment to make on god. God doesn't appear to exist in the natural world or have any effect on it, and physics deals with the natural world. All it can say is 'there doesn't appear to be a god and we're not taking the supernatural under consideration since it doesn't exist'.

Answer 7

factor a million) The universe isn't countless. the gap-time continuum has countless stretchability which will enable the universe to boost until eventually the main user-friendly components of count can not stay linked. factor 2) In an limitless universe, God would desire to exist internally, yet on account that, with the aid of definition, God is supernatural then he can't exist in a organic universe. factor 3) If God exists, then he would desire to exist externally and because we can't show an exterior existence, we can't show that God exists.

Answer 8

I M not a Christian. I M a Muslim. I have read the Quran and based on my knowledge of Physics and Quran, I rather think Physics believe in God.

Even Einstien believed in Him

Answer 9

Physics does not rule out the possibility of God, anymore than God rules out the possibility of physics. They are not mutually exclusive.

Answer 10

No. And to be fair, God doesn't rule out the possibility of physics.

Answer 11

PHysics is science and science is simply a human endevour to understand God's creation. I do not know how post fact observations could rule out God. A scientist is simply trying to figure out how God did it. I do not understand why so many fundamentalists are anti science.